期刊文献+

航空发动机顶层设计指标评价方法及软件开发 被引量:2

Method and Software for Quantitative Evaluation of Top-level Design Index of Aero-engine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用层次分析、熵值、质量功能展开、模糊综合评价等运筹学的基本方法,结合航空发动机行业的技术特点,建立了一套能够量化评估航空发动机的先进性和技术成熟度等顶层设计指标的评价方法,并在C++Builder编译环境下开发了面向对象的评估软件。在民用航空发动机项目中的实际应用表明,方法能够对航空发动机的先进性和技术风险等顶层设计指标进行合理的量化评估,并对航空发动机研发过程中的技术成熟度进行动态跟踪。 A method for the quantitative evaluation of top-level design index of aero engine ,such as pro-gressiveness and technical readiness ,was built by combining the characteristics of aero-engine industry and mathematical methodology of operations research that includes analytical hierarchy process ,entropy value method ,quality functional deployment and fussy comprehensive evaluation method .The object-ori-ented evaluation software was also developed under the complier environment of C++ builder .The practi-cal examples of that the software are able to evaluate the progressiveness and technical readiness of an aero engine project quantitatively and reasonably ,and also can trace the technical readiness dynamically in the developing process of aero engine project .
出处 《航空计算技术》 2014年第2期58-61,共4页 Aeronautical Computing Technique
基金 国家自然科学基金项目资助(51276148)
关键词 航空发动机 先进性评估 技术成熟度评估 aero-engine progressiveness evaluation technical readiness evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献25

  • 1张宜军,陆万宏.一种基于熵权法的通信干扰系统效能评估模型[J].舰船电子工程,2007,27(1):123-124. 被引量:4
  • 2张涛,张建军,郭波,谭跃进.装备使用阶段维修保障能力评估指标体系研究[J].装甲兵工程学院学报,2005,19(1):7-10. 被引量:27
  • 3何蕾,宋一中,路潇.熵理论在装备保障指挥组织结构优化中的应用[J].军械工程学院学报,2006,18(1):50-52. 被引量:5
  • 4[2]李登峰,许腾.海军运筹分析教程[M].北京:海潮出版社,2004.
  • 5黄力伟.水面舰艇作战指挥效能的模糊综合评判法[J].海军大连舰艇学院学报,2006,(4):11-13.
  • 6Smith J, Egglestone G, Farr P, et al. Technical risk assessment of Australian defence projects[R]. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, ADA430722, 2005-15, 2005.
  • 7Graettinger C P, Garcia Miller S, Siviy J, et al. Using the tehnology readiness levels scale to support technology management in the DOD's ATD/STO environments: a findings and recommendations report conducted for army CECOM[R]. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute,CMU/SEI-2002 SR 027,2002.
  • 8Ruth B A,German B J, Mavris D N. Adaptive selection of engine technology solution sets from a large combinatorial space[R]. Salt Lake City, UT:the 2001 AIAA/ASME/ SAE Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA 2001-3208,2001.
  • 9Roth B A, Mavris D N, Macsotai N I, Adaptive selection of aircraft engine technologies in the presence of risk [J]. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,Z004,126(1):40 -44.
  • 10Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York: McGraw Hill Company, 1980.

共引文献73

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部