期刊文献+

基于理性预期与顾客策略行为的供应链契约比较 被引量:11

A Comparison of Supply Chain Contracts Based on Rational Expectations and Strategic Consumer Behaviors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在理性预期均衡的框架下,研究面临策略型消费者时,供应链上下游企业作为一个利益共同体如何更好地进行机制设计与契约选择的问题。本文首先分析零售商与顾客之间的理性预期问题,在此基础上对供应链批发价契约和回购契约下的供应链绩效及其影响因素进行比较。本文的研究结果表明:在存在顾客策略行为的情况下,回购契约比批发价契约更加可以激励零售商提高订购量,促使零售商保持较高的售价;当消费者对产品的价值估计值越高、批发价格越低、生产成本越高时,回购契约会更加有利于零售商。并且,当顾客对产品的价值估值超过一定的阈值点时,供应链利润最大时回购契约下的最优订购量大于批发价契约下的最优订购量。但是,供应链利润最大时,回购契约与批发价契约下的供应链利润大小关系则不确定。此外,本文还讨论了同时考虑策略型消费者和消费者退货的情形。 Some consumers may delay purchases when they anticipate that prices may decrease in the future.They anticipate the probability of markdown,compare the difference of utility between buy now and buy later,and determine the best timing of purchase.This strategic or forward-looking behavior is known as strategic consumer behavior.With increasing number of strategic consumers,their behaviors have attracted increasing attention and need to be considered when designing supply chain contracts.Wholesale price contract and buyback contract are two types of contract that have been discussed widely.However,the questions of (1) whether the buyback contract performs better than wholesale price contract,and (2) how to choose and change a supply chain contract for the retailer and manufacturer,need to be studied with the consideration of strategic consumer behavior.In this paper,we use a framework of rational expectations equilibrium and study the problems of mechanism design and supply chain contract selection with strategic consumers.We first consider a supply chain with one retailer and one manufacturer and begin with an analysis of rational expectation problems between the retailer and consumer.We then compare supply chain performance with wholesale price contract and buyback contract and provide principles for designing and selecting the contract.We show in this paper that a buyback contract with strategic consumer behavior can motivate retailers to improve both order quantity and price more than a wholesale price contract.A buyback contract will benefit the retailer more than the supplier with an increase of product valuation,a decrease of wholesale price,and an increase of production cost.A supply chain with buyback contract will have higher optimal order quantity than a supply chain with wholesale price contract when the consumers' valuation of product exceeds a threshold.However,a supply chain with buyback contract is not always performing better than a supply chain with wholesale price contract.We also discuss the situations with both strategic consumer behavior and consumer returns.We find that the probability of returns will affect retailer's optimal price and optimal quantity.With the increase of the probability of return,the optimal quantity of the retailer with wholesale price contract will decrease whereas the optimal price will increase.With the increase of the probability of return,the optimal quantity of the retailer with buyback contract will also decrease.This implies that the retailer will counteract the disadvantages of returns by restricting supply with either wholesale price contract or buyback contract.We also find that with strategic consumer behavior and consumer returns the optimal quantity of retailer with buyback contract will still be larger than the optimal quantity of retailer with wholesale price contract.The buyback contract will also benefit the retailer more than the supplier.
作者 王夏阳 赵婷
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期167-173,共7页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71102101) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(10YJC630251)
关键词 顾客策略行为 理性预期均衡 回购契约 批发价契约 strategic consumer behavior rational expectations equilibrium buyback contract wholesale price contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1拉古,张忠.让顾客自己来定价[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2012:10一12.
  • 2Byrnes N, Zellner W. Playing the discount game [ J ]. Business Week, Dee. 13, 2004.
  • 3Su X, Zhang F. Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance [ J ]. Management Science, 2008, 54 (10) :1759 - 17731.
  • 4Jerath K, Netessine S, Veeraraghavan SK. Revenue management with strategic customers: last-minute selling and opaque selling [J]- Management Science, 2010, 56 (3): 430-448.
  • 5Caehon GP, Swinney R. Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers[ J]. Management Science, 2009,55(3) : 497 -511.
  • 6Cachon GP, Swinney R. The Value of fast fashion: quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior [ J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(4): 778-795.
  • 7黄松,杨超,张曦.考虑战略顾客行为时的供应链性能分析与协调[J].管理科学学报,2012,15(2):47-58. 被引量:50
  • 8Anderson CK, Wilson JG. Wait or buy? The strategic consumer: pricing and profit implications [ J ]. Journal of Operational Research Society, 2003, 54 (3) : 299 - 306.
  • 9Su X. Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior[ J]. Management Science, 2007, 53 (5) : 726 - 741.
  • 10Su X, Zhang F. On the value of commitment and availability guarantees when selling to strategic consumers [ J ]. Management Science, 2009, 55 ( 5 ) :713 - 726.

二级参考文献126

共引文献224

同被引文献90

引证文献11

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部