1Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al . Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(3):213 -224.
2Puymirat E, Muller O, Sharif F, et al. Fractional flow reserve: concepts, applications and use in France in 2010. Arch Cardio- vasc Dis, 2010,103 : 615-622.
3Park S J, Ahn JM, Kang SJ. Paradigm shift to functional angio- plasty: new insights for fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Circula- tion, 2011,124 ." 951-957.
4Kern M J, Lerman A, Bech JW, et al. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laborato- ry: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheteriza- tion, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation,2006,114: 1321-1341.
5Kern M J, Samady H. Current concepts of inte grated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010,55 : 173-185.
6Dias CC, Mateus P, Rodriques A, et al. Value of fractional flow reserve in the management of patients with moderate coronary stenosis. Rev Port Cardil, 2004,23 : 1409-1416.
7Casella G, Leibig M, Schiele TM, et al. Are high doses of intra- coronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adeno- sine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve? Am Heart J, 2004,148 : 590-595.
8Koo BK, Kim CH, Na SH, et al. Intracoronary continuous adenosine infusion. Circ J, 2005,69 : 908-912.
9Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percuta- neous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant steno- sis: 52 year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,49:2105-2111.
10Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow re- serve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary in- tervention. N Engl J Med,2009,360:213-224.
