摘要
上世纪90年代以来,我国的文学研究出现了繁荣的局面,无论是理论阐释还是资料发掘都达到了前所未有的高度和深度。但是,也应看到,由于文本研究的方法风靡文坛之后,现行的学术体制使得学院派充当了学术研究的主力,学院派研究所存在的缺憾,给当前的文学创作带来了一些不利影响,其夫子自道式的表述,使文学评论在文学创作面前越来越缺乏权威性。学院派研究的迅速崛起和众多批评家的悄然退隐直接导致了文学评论的失语。二月河等人的历史小说创作由于不肯遵从当今的学术体制,所以在艺术创作的道路上实现了突围。
Since the 1990s, China has enjoyed prosperity of literary research, up to a un- precedented level of height and depth in both theoretical interpretation and data eoUeetion. But we should also see that, as the method of textual study becomes popular in the literary field, in the current academic system academies serve as the mainstream for academic research. The deficiency in the research by the aeodemies has brought some adverse effects to the current literary creation impacting the authoritativeness of literary criticism on the literary creation. The rapid rise of the a- cademic research and gradual disappearance of a large number of critics directly led to the “apha- sia” of literary review. Er Yue He et al's historical novels, thanks to their refusal to comply with the current academic system, are found to have achieved certain breakthrough in artistic creation.
出处
《临沧师范高等专科学校学报》
2014年第1期31-36,共6页
Journal of Lincang Education College
关键词
学术体制
文本研究
学院派
历史小说
academic system
textual research
academics
historical novel