期刊文献+

早期应用神经肌肉阻断剂治疗严重脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究 被引量:18

Clinical study of early use of neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with severe sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察早期应用神经肌肉阻断剂(NMBA)治疗严重脓毒症合并急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的临床效果.方法 采用前瞻性临床研究方法,选择2012年7月至2013年9月广西壮族自治区柳州市人民医院重症监护病房(ICU)收治的96例严重脓毒症合并ARDS患者,根据ARDS柏林定义分为重度ARDS组(48例)及中度ARDS组(48例),各组再按随机数字表法分为治疗组与对照组,每组24例.所有患者按照2008年国际严重脓毒症与感染性休克治疗指南给予综合治疗,并在镇静,镇痛基础上行气管插管机械通气;治疗组在机械通气开始时给予负荷剂量维库溴铵0.1mg/kg后以0.05 mg· kg^-1·h^-1持续静脉泵入24 ~ 48 h.比较两组患者治疗前和治疗48 h后急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、氧合指数(paO2/FiO2)、中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)、动脉血乳酸(Lac)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)水平及21d病死率.结果 在中度或重度ARDS患者中,治疗组与对照组治疗前APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分、PaO2/FiO2、ScvO2、Lac、CRP比较差异均无统计学意义.在重度ARDS患者中,治疗组治疗48 h后APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分、PaO2/FiO2、ScvO2、Lac的改善均较对照组明显[APACHEⅡ评分(分):16.58±2.41比19.79±3.52,t=3.679,P=0.010; SOFA评分(分):12.04±2.17比14.75±3.26,t=3.385,P=0.010;PaO2/FiO2(mmHg,1mmHg=0.133 kPa):159.31±22.57比131.81±34.93,t=3.239,P=0.020; ScvO2:0.673±0.068比0.572±0.142,t=3.137,P=0.030;Lac(mmol/L):3.10±1.01比4.39±1.72,t=3.161,P=0.030],而CRP差异无统计学意义(mg/L:180.91±37.14比174.66±38.46,t=0.572,P=0.570);且治疗组21d病死率明显低于对照组[20.8% (5/24)比50.0%(12/24),Х^2=4.463,P=0.035].在中度ARDS患者中,治疗组与对照组治疗48 h后,除CRP无明显变化外,各指标均有所改善,但两组间各项指标比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);治疗组21d病死率略低于对照组,但差异也无统计学意义[16.7%(4/24)比25.0%(6/24),Х^2=0.505,P=0.477].结论 早期使用NMBA治疗严重脓毒症合并重度ARDS患者,不仅能有效改善病情严重程度,且能够降低21d病死率. Objective To observe the clinical effects of early use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) in patients with severe sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods A prospective study was conducted.96 patients with severe sepsis and ARDS admitted from July 2012 to September 2013 to intensive care unit (ICU) of Liuzhou People's Hospital in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were enrolled and divided into severe ARDS group (n=48) and moderate ARDS group (n=48) according to the Berlin definition of ARDS.Then patients in each group were randomly divided into treatment group (n =24) and control group (n=24).All patients with diagnosis in accordance with the 2008 international septic shock and severe sepsis treatment guidelines were provided with comprehensive treatment and mechanical ventilation on the basis of analgesia and sedation.The patients in treatment group were given a loading dose of vecuronium during mechanical ventilation,started with 0.1 mg/kg up to 0.05 mg ·kg^-1·h^-1 for continuous intravenous infusion for 24-48 hours.The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score,sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA),arterial oxygenation index (PaOfFiO2),central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2),arterial blood lactate (Lac),C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of two groups were compared before treatment and 48 hours after treatment,and 21-day mortality rate was finally compared.Results In moderate or severe ARDS group,there were no statistically significant difference in APACHE Ⅱ score,SOFA score,PaO2/FiO2,ScvO2,Lac and CRP before treatment between two groups.APACHE Ⅱ score,SOFA score,PaO2/FiO2,ScvO2,and Lac 48 hours after treatment were significantly improved in severe ARDS group compared with control group [APACHE Ⅱ score:16.58 ± 2.41 vs.19.79 ± 3.52,t=3.679,P=0.010; SOFA score:12.04 ± 2.17 vs.14.75 ±3.26,t=3.385,P=0.010; PaO2/FiO2 (mmHg,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa):159.31 ±22.57 vs.131.81 ± 34.93,t=3.239,P=0.020; ScyO2:0.673 ± 0.068 vs.0.572 ± 0.142,t=3.137,P=0.030; Lac (mmol/L):3.10 ± 1.01 vs.4.39 ± 1.72,t=3.161,P=0.030],while the value of CRP (mg/L) showed no significant difference (180.91 ±37.14 vs.174.66 ± 38.46,t=0.572,P=0.570).21-day mortality in treatment group was significantly lower than that in control group [20.8% (5/24) vs.50.0% (12/24),Х^2=4.463,P=0.035].In moderate ARDS group,each of the above clinical parameters were improved in both groups expect for CRP at 48 hours after treatment,but the indexes showed no statistically significant difference between two groups (all P〉0.05).21-day mortality rate in the treatment group was slightly lower than that in the control group which showed no statistically significant difference [16.7% (4/24) vs.25.0%(6/24),Х^2=0.505,P=0.477].Conclusion The early use of NMBA treatment of patients with severe sepsis and severe ARDS cannot only improve the severity but also reduce 21-day mortality.
出处 《中华危重病急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期325-329,共5页 Chinese Critical Care Medicine
基金 广西壮族自治区医药卫生科研课题(Z2012582)
关键词 神经肌肉阻断剂 严重脓毒症 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 Neuromuscular blocking agents Severe sepsis Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Bernard GR,Artigas A,Brigham KL. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS.Definitions,mechanisms,relevant outcomes,and clinical trial coordination[J].American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,1994,(3 Pt 1):818-824.
  • 2梁英健,张晓娟,李鑫,马晓春.脓毒症患者血中组织因子、血管性血友病因子与肿瘤坏死因子-α改变的临床意义[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2012,19(2):104-106. 被引量:28
  • 3章志丹,马晓春.脓毒症血管内皮细胞损伤与微循环功能障碍[J].中国危重病急救医学,2011,23(2):125-128. 被引量:32
  • 4Wheeler AP,Bemard GR. Acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome:a clinical review[J].The Lancet,2007,(9572):1553-1564.
  • 5Sheu CC,Gong MN,Zhai R. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of sepsis-related vs non-sepsis-related ARDS[J].CHEST,2010,(03):559-567.
  • 6McIntyre RC Jr,Pulido EJ,Bensard DD. Thirty years of clinical trials in acute respiratory distress syndrome[J].CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE,2000,(09):3314-3331.
  • 7Peek G J,Mugford M,Tiruvoipati R. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR):a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J].The Lancet,2009,(9698):1351-1363.
  • 8刘大为.机械通气与急性呼吸窘迫综合征[J].中国危重病急救医学,2010(3):129-130. 被引量:30
  • 9Dellinger RP,Levy MM,Carlet JM. Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2008[J].CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE,2008,(01):296-327.
  • 10ARDS Definition Task Force. Acute respiratory distress syndrome:the Berlin Definition[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,2012,(23):2526-2533.

二级参考文献164

  • 1张仁岭,张胜华,冯寿全.四君子汤加大黄对脓毒症大鼠肠黏膜屏障功能的保护作用[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2006,14(3):160-163. 被引量:24
  • 2林洪远,管向东,周立新,艾宇航,王可富.乌司他丁、α1胸腺肽联合治疗严重脓毒症——一种新的免疫调理治疗方法的临床研究[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(7):451-457. 被引量:100
  • 3林洪远.从KyberSept和OPTIMIST研究失败看肝素治疗脓毒症的潜力[J].中国危重病急救医学,2007,19(3):134-137. 被引量:27
  • 4Dellinger R P,Levy M M,Carlet J M,et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock:2008[J]. Crit Care Med,2008,36(1): 296-327.
  • 5Wrigge H,Zinserling J,Muders T,et al. Electrical impedance tomography compared with thoracic computed tomography during a slow inflation maneuver in experimental models of lung injury. Crit Care Med, 2008,36:903-909.
  • 6Tassaux D,Gainnier M ,Battisti A,et al. Impact of expiratory trigger setting on delayed cycling and inspiratory muscle workload. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005,172 : 1283-1289.
  • 7Chan KP, Stewart TE, Mehta S. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for adult patients with ARDS. Chest, 2007,131 : 1907-1916.
  • 8Bein T,Weber F,Philipp A,et al. A new pumpless extracorporeal interventional lung assist in critical hypoxemia/hypereapnia. Crit Care Med,2006,34:1372-1377.
  • 9[1]Hickling KG,Henderson SJ,Jackson R.Low mortality associated with low volume pressure limited ventilation with permissive hypercapnia in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome[J].Intensive Care Med,1990,16:372-377.
  • 10[2]Kacmarek RM,Hess D.Pressure-controlled inverse-ratio ventilation:panacea or auto-PEEP[J]?Respir Care,1990,35:945-948.

共引文献858

同被引文献224

引证文献18

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部