期刊文献+

正性护理干预降低非必须剖宫产率的可行性研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:制定系列化孕期持续正性干预的护理措施,并与未实行全程正性干预的回顾性病例作对比研究,观察并分析其在降低非必须性剖宫产率的作用。方法选取2009年1月~2012年12月在广东省东莞康华医院住院分娩的产妇2000例,随机分为对照组(不干预组)和观察组(正性持续全程护理干预组),每组1000例产妇。通过对比研究,分析其在降低非必须性剖宫产率中的作用。结果对照组非必须剖宫产率为43%,观察组非必须剖宫产率为18%。结论孕期持续全程正性护理干预,可以让孕妇认识自然分娩的好处,增强自然分娩的信心,消除对分娩的紧张、恐惧及分娩的误区,从容面对自然分娩,同时减轻分娩引起的产痛,降低胎方位异常的发生率,有效降低非必须剖宫产率。 Objective Formulate nursing measures of continuous positive intervention during pregnancy,and not the STD cases full positive intervention study,analysis of the reduced to the rate of cesarean section to the role and compare. Methods A retrospective study was carried out in our hospital from 2009 January through 2012 December to women,Random selection without medical indication of cesarean section parturients,a total of 2700 women,not the intervention group,continuous intervention group and intervention group continued,each of the 900 mothers.Through the comparison of the three sets of data,in the analysis of non must reduce cesarean section rate. Results The control group was 43%non-essential caesarean section the obsorvation group was 18%non-essential caesrean section. Conclusion Not to harm of increasing cesarean section rate has become the new difficulties and social problems in clinical work,to reduce social factors as indication of cesarean section rate be imperative.Through the pregnancy continued the positive nursing intervention,can let the women know the benefits of natural childbirth,to enhance the natural childbirth confidence,and her husband and family support.The elimination of labor tension,fear and misunderstanding of childbirth,calm in the face of natural childbirth,at the same time to reduce delivery caused by pain and reduce the incidence of abnormal fetal position,effectively reduce unnecessary cesarean section.
出处 《当代医学》 2014年第13期109-110,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 正性干预 非必须剖宫产 护理 降低 孕期 Positive intervention Non-essential caesrean Care Reduced Pregency
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1鲁小红,黄醒华.剖宫产率与围产儿死亡率的关系[J].中华妇产科杂志,1994,29(8):453-455. 被引量:132
  • 2郑平,黄醒华,王淑珍.35年剖宫产率及适应证的变化[J].中华妇产科杂志,1996,31(3):142-145. 被引量:225
  • 3陈乔珠,何静妍,谢静颖.300例社会因素剖宫产术分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(4):411-413. 被引量:24
  • 4凌萝达 顾美礼.头位难产[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1989.132-135.
  • 5刘映瞵.高危妊娠监护治疗学[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1997.94-97.
  • 6Betrain AP,Merialdi M,Lauer JA,et al.Rates of caesarean section:analysis of global ,regional and national estimates[J]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2007,21 (2) : 98-113.
  • 7Souza JP,Papinelli MA,Amaral E,et al.Obstetric care and severe pregnancy complications in latin america and the caribbean:an analysis of information from demographic health surveys [J].Rev Panam Salud Publiea,2007,21 (6): 396-401.
  • 8曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M](第1版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.474-476.
  • 9曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.2129.
  • 10BiggsJSG.剖宫产增加[J].国外医学:妇产科学分册,1985,14(4):215-215.

共引文献758

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部