期刊文献+

迭代重建结合自动管电流调节低剂量扫描技术在肺结节检查中的应用 被引量:9

In the application of lung nodules using automatic tube current regulation(ATCM) combined with the iterative reconstruction(ASIR) technology
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胸部宝石CT自动管电流调节(ATCM)结合自适应迭代重建(ASIR)低剂量扫描技术在肺结节检查中的应用。方法对80例常规胸部CT检查发现肺结节的患者采用宝石能谱CT行两次扫描。第1次扫描采用单纯ATCM技术,第2次扫描采用ATCM技术结合50%ASIR重建。噪声指数根据体重指数(BMI)确定,第1次扫描(纯ATCM组):BMI≤22 kg/m2、噪声指数为14,BMI>22kg/m2、噪声指数为20;第2次扫描(ATCM结合ASIR组):BMI≤22?kg/m2、噪声指数为20,BMI>22?kg/m2、噪声指数为26。由2名放射科医师分别对图像质量和图像噪声进行主观评分(5分制),并采用Kappa检验观察不同医师间评定结果的一致性。记录两组的CT剂量容积指数(CTDIvol),并采用配对样本t检验比较。比较两次扫描肺结节的检出率,分析两次扫描影像显示结节的数目和大小。结果 ATCM结合ASIR组CTDIvol为(1.60±0.45)mGy,单纯ATCM组CTDIvol为(4.26±0.41)mGy,结合ASIR技术可以降低约62%的剂量,两组差异有统计学意义(t=26.81,P<0.05)。单纯ATCM组,2名医师的图像质量评分分别为(4.50±0.48)分和(4.35±0.27)分,Kappa=0.862,P<0.01;ATCM结合ASIR组,2名医师的图像质量评分分别为(4.96±0.36)分和(4.82±0.45)分,Kappa=0.795,P<0.01。单纯ATCM组,2名医师的图像噪声评分分别为(4.18±0.52)分和(3.90±0.42)分,Kappa=0.648,P<0.01;ATCM结合ASIR组,2名医师的图像噪声评分分别为(4.42±0.43)分和(4.41±0.26)分,Kappa=0.788,P<0.01。所有图像质量评分均达到满足影像诊断的要求。两种扫描方案扫描检出肺结节的数目相等,且肺结节的直径间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论胸部CT扫描可提升噪声指数,并且应用ASIR技术获得的图像能够保证图像质量符合临床诊断要求,并进一步减少辐射剂量,更适合对肺结节进行筛查、初步诊断和随访。 Objective To investigate the feasibility to reduce radiation doses on lung nodules using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique(ASIR) associated with automated tube current modulation technique(ATCM). Methods Eighty patients revealed lung nodules with precious stones energy spectrum CT line scan twice with ATCM and the follow-up scan with ATCM cooperated with 50% ASIR.ATCM was used with age-dependent noise index(NI)settings: NI=14 for NI≤22 and NI=20 for〉22 for simple ATCM group. NI=20 for NI≤22 and NI=26 for〉22 for ATCM cooperated with 50%ASIR group(AISR group). Two radiologists independently evaluated images for diagnostic quality and image noise with subjectively image quality score and image noise score using a 5-point scale. Interobserver agreement was assessed by Kappa test. The volume CT dose indexes(CTDIv01) for the two groups were recorded.Statistical significance for the CTDIv01 value was analyzed by pair-sample t test. Compare two scanning detection of lung nodules, analysis two scanning images shows that the number and size of nodules. Results The average CTDIvol for the ASIR group was (1.60±0.45)mGy, about 62%lower than (4.26±0.41)mGy for the simple ATCM group, and the CTDIvol of two groups had statistically significant differences(t=26.81, P〈0.05). The subjective image quality scores for the simple ATCM group were 4.50±0.48 and 4.39±0.61, Kappa=0.862, P〈0.01 (ASIR group:4.96±0.36 and 4.82 ±0.45, Kappa=0.795, P〈0.01), by two observers. The image noise score for the simple ATCM group were 4.18±0.52 and 3.90±0.42, Kappa=0.648, P〈0.01 (ASIR group: 4.42±0.43 and 4.41±0.26, Kappa=0.788, P〈0.01), by two observers. All images had acceptable diagnostic image quality.Two scanning scanning program number of detection of lung nodules is equal and difference between the diameter of the pulmonary nodules no statistical significance (P〉0.05). Conclusion Lower radiation dose can be achieved by elevating N1 with ASIR in the CT chest studies, while maintaining diagnostically acceptable images for screening for lung nodules primary diagnosis and follow-up.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2014年第6期44-47,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
基金 扬州大学临床医学院院级基金(yzucms201209)
关键词 肺肿瘤 辐射剂量 自适应迭代重建 自动管电流调节 Lung neoplasms Radiation dosage Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction Automated tube current modulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献99

  • 1Colang JE, Killion JB, Vano E. Patient dose from CT: a literature review. Radiol Technol,2007,79 : 17-26.
  • 2Brenner D J, Hall EJ. Computed tomography:an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med,2007 ,357 :2277-2284.
  • 3Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, et al. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics ,2007,120:677-682.
  • 4Campbell J, Kalra MK, Rizzo S, et al. Scanning beyond anatomic limits of the thorax in chest CT: findings, radiation dose, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR,2005,185 : 1525-1530.
  • 5Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS,et al. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body application of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. AJR, 2001, 176: 303 -306.
  • 6Nyman U, Ahl TL, Kristiansson M, et al. Patient-circumference- adapted dose regulation in body computed tomography, a practical and flexible formula. Acta Radiol, 2005,46:396-406.
  • 7Sigal-Clinquabre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, et al. Low- kilovohage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Rdiology,2004,231: 169-174.
  • 8Thomas CK, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, et al. Coronary artery calcium scoring with muhislice computed tomography: in vitro assessment of a low tube voltage protocol. Invest Radiol, 2006, 41:668-673.
  • 9Heneghan JP, McGuire KA, Leder RA, et al. Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation : dose techniques. Radiology, 2003,229 :575-580.
  • 10Haaga JR, Miraldi F, Maclntyre W, et al. The effect of mAs variation upon computed tomography image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies. Radiology, 1981, 138:449-454.

共引文献253

同被引文献93

  • 1中华医学会感染病学分会,中华预防医学会医院感染控制分会,中国医院协会医院感染管理专业委员会,中国老年医学学会感染管理质量控制分会,胡必杰,李太生,吴安华,李六亿,刘运喜,高晓东,鲍容,方婷婷,韩梦鸽,金文婷,李娜,林佳冰,林蕾蕾,骆煜,米宏霏,钱奕亦,史庆丰,王美霞,王萌冉,王青青,王苏珍,武渊,袁征,张尧,朱贝迪.医疗机构新型冠状病毒奥密克戎变异株感染防控专家共识[J].中华医学杂志,2023,103(8):545-558. 被引量:1
  • 2刘昌盛,李茂进,郑晓华,魏文洲,童四平,潘鄂武,唐兴桥.儿童肺部CT曝光参数及其辐射剂量的比较分析[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2005,25(5):460-462. 被引量:10
  • 3Kalra MK, Prasad S, Saini S, et al. Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality[J]. AIR Am J Roantgcnol, 2002, 179(5): 1101-1106.
  • 4Entrikin DW, Leipsic JA, Cart JJ. Optimization of radiation dose reduction in cardiac computed tomographic angiography[J]. Cardiol Rev, 2011, 19(4): 163-176.
  • 5Peng Y, Li J, Ma D, et al. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography[J]. Acta Radiol, 2009, 50(10): 1175-1181.
  • 6HuRon B, Nuyts J, Zaidi H. Itcrativc reconstruction methods[M]// Quantitative analysis in nuclear medicine imaging. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media, 2006: 107-140.
  • 7Utsunomiya D, Weigold WG; Weissman ( ct al. Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on quantitative and qualitative image analysis at 256-slice prospective gating cardiac CT[J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(6): 1287-1294.
  • 8Singh S, Kalra MK, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, et al. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid itcrative reconstruction for pediatric CT[J]. Radiology, 2012, 263(2): 537-546.
  • 9Gcrvaisc A, Osemont B, Lccocq S, ct al. CT image quality improvement using Adaptive Itcrative Dose Reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT[J]. Eur Rediol, 2012, 22(2): 295-301.
  • 10Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study[J]. Radiology, 2011,259(2): 565-573.

引证文献9

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部