期刊文献+

动态不确定因果图在化工过程故障诊断中的应用 被引量:6

Application of Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph to fault diagnosis in chemical processes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 化工过程具有高复杂性和高危险性等特点,且生产过程都是长周期连续运转,一旦出现故障就会造成巨大的损失,因此对化工过程进行实时的过程监控和故障诊断,对于确保化工生产过程的安全性具有十分重要的意义。动态不确定因果图(Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph,DUCG)理论是一种动态不确定因果知识的表达和推理方法,能够以图形方式简洁表达不确定因果关系,并基于证据化简图形知识库和进行事件展开运算,最终得到定性推理结果(可能的假设事件集合)及其发生的概率。以TE(Tennessee Eastman)化工过程为测试平台,对基于DUCG理论开发的一种新的应用于化工过程的实时过程监控与故障诊断系统进行了知识库构建和实时在线故障诊断测试,结果证明基于DUCG的化工过程故障诊断方法及开发的软件系统非常有效。 Chemical processes have the characteristics of high complexity and high risk, and the production process is in a continuous operation for a long period of time. Once a fault occurs, huge losses will be the result, so the re- al-time process monitoring and fault diagnosis of the chemical process are of great significance to ensuring the safety of the chemical production. The Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph (DUCG) is a methodology used to deal with knowledge representation and reasoning of dynamical uncertain causalities. DUCG is able to compactly and graphic- ally represent uncertain causalities, simplify the graphical knowledge base based on the online evidence and expand events as independent random event expressions, and finally reveals the qualitative reasoning results ( the set of the possible hypotheses) and the probabilities of these hypotheses. In this paper, we use the TE (Tennessee Eastman) process as the test platform, and the knowledge database is built for the new real-time process monitoring and the fault diagnosis is applied to the chemical process based on the DUCG and the real-time online fault diagnosis is per- formed. The results show that the fault diagnosis method based on the DUCG for chemical processes and our soft- ware system are very effective.
出处 《智能系统学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期154-160,共7页 CAAI Transactions on Intelligent Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61273330)
关键词 动态不确定因果图 故障诊断 化工过程 TE过程 Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph fault diagnosis chemical process Tennessee Eastman
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1FRANK P M. Fault diagnosis in dynamics systems using an- alytical and knowledge-based redundancy: a survey and some new results[ J]. Automatica, 1990, 26(3) : 459-474.
  • 2VENKATASUBRAMANIAN V, RENGASWAMY R, YIN K, et al. A review of process fault detection and diagnosis part I: quantitative model-based methods [ J ]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 2003, 27(3): 293-311.
  • 3VENKATASUBRAMANIAN V, RENGASWAMY R, KA- VURI S N. A review of process fault detection and diagnosis part II: quantitative model and search strategies [ J ]. Com- puters and Chemical Engineering, 2003, 27(3) : 313-326.
  • 4VENKATASUBRAMANIAN V, RENGASWAMY R, KA- VURI S N, et al. A review of process fault detection and di- agnosis part III : process history based methods [ J ]. Com- puters and Chemical Engineering, 2003, 27(3) : 327-346.
  • 5张勤.Dynamic Uncertain Causality Graph for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Discrete DAG Cases[J].Journal of Computer Science & Technology,2012,27(1):1-23. 被引量:24
  • 6ZHANG Qin , DONG Chunling , CUI Yan, et al. Dynamic uncertain causality graph for knowledge representation and probabilistie reasoning: statisties base, matrix, and appliea- tion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learn- ing Systems, 2013(99) :1-18.
  • 7DOWNS J J, VOGEL E F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem[ J ]. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 1993, 17(3) : 245-255.

二级参考文献31

  • 1Lucas P J F. Bayesian network modeling through qualitative patterns. Artificial Intelligence, 2005, 163(2): 233-263.
  • 2Shortliffe E H, Buchanan B G. A model of inexact reason in medicine. Mathematical Bioscience, 1975, 23(3/4): 351-379.
  • 3Sharer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 4Duda R O et al. Development of the Prospector consultation system for mineral exploration. Final report, SRI Project 5821 and 6415, SRI International, 1978.
  • 5Zadeh L A. The role of fuzzy logic in the management of un- certainty in expert systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983, 11: 199-227.
  • 6Pearl J. Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief net- works. Artificial Intelligence, 1986, 29(3): 241-288.
  • 7Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann, 1988. ISBN 0-934613-73-7.
  • 8Henrion M. Practical issues in constructing a Bayes' belief network. In Proc. the 3rd Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, July 1987, pp.132-139.
  • 9Srinivas S. A generalization of the noisy-OR model. In Proe. the 9th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, San Fran- cisco, July 1993, pp.208-215.
  • 10Diez F J. Parameter adjustment in Bayes networks: The gen- eralized noisy-OR gate. In Proc. the 9th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelliqence, 1993, pp.99-105.

共引文献23

同被引文献47

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部