期刊文献+

论我国证券欺诈赔偿责任机制的完善 被引量:3

The Improvement of the Securities Frauds Restitution Obligation Mechanism in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 在我国证券欺诈案中,个人投资者救济难题是投资者"代理人"责任规则不健全、证券欺诈救济机制不完善的结果。不当获利返还原则是内涵"矫正正义"的结构性原则,该原则将投资者收益权保障目标贯穿于投资者代理人过错考察和证券欺诈赔偿基金制度中。"公平基金"等证券投资者赔偿基金,是该原则的具体应用。在2008年美国金融危机前后,大量投资者通过公平基金获偿。这也为我国投资者救济难题的解决和证券欺诈赔偿责任机制的完善提供了新的分析思路。 The insufficiency of individual investor protection is the result of the deficiency of the deputy's obligation and the defects of the investor's relief mechanism. Unjust enrichment is a structural principle and enrolls the principle of corrective justice. The principle of unjust enrichment, introduce the objective of investors protection to the process which is of examining deputies fault and the process which is of establishing restitution funds. Fair funds are restitution funds, which ap- ply the principle of unjust enrichment. Fair funds play positive role for restituting public investors'loss, especially the loss that occurred in 2008 financial crisis of United States. The success of Fair funds implies that, both of the principle of unjust enrichment and the mechanism of restitution can be introduced to China's Securities Law to protect individual investor.
作者 张春丽
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期102-107,共6页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 中国法学会部级法学研究重大课题(CLS(2011)A02)"经济发展方式转变中的法律问题研究"
关键词 不当获利 赔偿 证券欺诈 个人投资者 unjust enrichment restitution securities frauds obligation individual investors
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Gerhard Dannemann, Defenses and Objections to Liability in Restitution, Is Unjust Enrichment Law an Officious Intermed- dler[J3. 92 Boston University Law Review. ,2012:991 -1008.
  • 2Andrew Burrows, Topic I: Issues of Restitution Doctrine, Restitution of Mistaken Enrichments [ J . 92 Boston University Law Review. ,2012:767 - 791.
  • 3Ernest J. Weinrib, The Structure of Unjustness [ J . 92 Boston University Law Review,2012 : 1067 - ! 979.
  • 4Jensen & Meckling, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure[J]. 3 Journal of Fi- nancial Economics, 1976:306 - 325.
  • 5Hart, Oliver and John Moore, Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation[ J. 56 Econometrica, 1988:755 -785.
  • 6Markowitz, H. , Mean- Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets[ M. New Hope, Pa. : Frank J. Fabozzi Associates, 2000.
  • 7Barker, Kit, Understanding the Unjust Enrichment Principle in Private Law: A Study of the Concept and Its Reasons, in Un- derstanding Unjust Enriehment[M. Ed. by J. Neyers, M. Mclnnes, S. Pitel. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004.
  • 8Saul Levmore, Rethinking Ponzi -Scheme Remedies in and out of Bankruptcy[ J. 92 Boston University Law Review,2012: 969 - 990.
  • 9涂永前.美国2009年《个人消费者金融保护署法案》及其对我国金融监管法制的启示[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2010,28(3):160-168. 被引量:19
  • 10Don Carrillo, Disgorgement Plans Under the Fair Funds Provision of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 : Are Creditors and Investor Truly Being Protected [ J . 6 Journal of DePaul Business and Commercial Law,2008:315 - 345.

二级参考文献93

共引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部