平台经营者超高定价的反垄断法规制被引量：11

Anti-monopoly Law Regulation of Platform Operator's Aggressive Pricing

导出

摘要淘宝商城事件折射了平台经营者定价的现实困境:双边市场的交叉网络外部性和互补性等经济特点决定了平台经营以不对称定价为基本特征,但从法律角度看,实施免费策略的一边市场可能涉嫌掠夺性定价,而回收总经营成本的另一边市场又可能涉嫌超高定价。如何在分享平台经营降低交易成本、提高消费者福利等正面经济效应的同时,恰当界定这种新型经营者的权利、义务边界,避免其市场力量的不当利用,是平台经营者定价反垄断法规制中需要考虑的核心问题。 The event of Taobao Mall price dispute reflects the dilemma for online platforms when they make price decisions. On the one hand, the economic characters require online platforms to take asymmetric price policy, on the other hand, such price policy may cause platforms to face predatory pricing accusation in one side market while aggressive pricing accusation in the other. How to determine the rights and obligations for platforms to make price decisions is the core consideration for anti - monopoly law - makers and enforcement bodies.

作者叶卫平

机构地区深圳大学法学院

出处《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期108-115,共8页 Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基金司法部国家法治与法学理论研究资助项目(08SFB3032)

关键词平台经营者超高定价双边市场反垄断法规制 platform operator aggressive pricing two -sided markets anti -monopoly law regulation

分类号 DF414 [政治法律—经济法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1顾晓波.淘宝商城发布新规:服务年费提升5至10倍[EB/OL].[2012-6-24].http://tech.ifeng.com/intemet/detail-2011-10/10/97300160.shtml.
2阳淼.“反淘宝联盟”暂停攻击,淘宝商城否认涨价[EB/OL].[2012-6-24].http://media.people.c:om.cn/GB/40728/15912236.html.
3佚名.淘宝商城新规修改:2012年可交纳一半保证金[EB/OL].[2012-6-24].http://www.cnr.cn/gundong/201110/t20111017_508639134.shtml.
4陈亮.商务部:淘宝商城事件已得到较好处理,将推相关条例尽早出台[EB/OL].[2012-6-24].http://www.cnr.cn/china/gdgg/201110/t20111019_508651120.shtml.
5王晓哗.反垄断法[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.
6马泰成.榨取性滥用之管制:政策理念与实务困境[J].公平交易季刊,2009,(1):41-63.
7陈宏民,胥莉.双边市场:企业竞争环境的新视角[M].上海:世纪出版集团,上海人民出版社,2007.
8Alison Oldale, Elizabeth Wang. A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing : price controls in the Yellow Pages industry [ J E. C. L. R. 2004, 25(10) :607 -610.
9Robert W. Crandall, J. Gregory Sidak. Should regulators set rates to terminate calls on mobile net works? [J]. 21 Yale J. On Reg. 261.
10纪汉霖,管锡展.双边市场及其定价策略研究[J].外国经济与管理,2006,28(3):15-23. 被引量：70

二级参考文献44

1程贵孙,孙武军.银行卡产业运作机制及其产业规制问题研究——基于双边市场理论视角[J].国际金融研究,2006(1):39-46. 被引量：59
2反垄断法草案第十七条.
3P.贝伦斯.对于占市场支配地位企业的滥用监督[A].王晓晔.反垄断法与市场经济[C].北京:法律出版社,1998.206-207.
4[美] 马歇尔·C.霍华德.美国反托拉斯法和贸易法规[M].孙南申译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.170-171.
5曹士兵.反垄断法研究[M].北京:法律出版社,1996..
6Roehet,J-C and J Tirole. Two-sided markets:an overview[EB/OL]. IDEI,2004.
7Evans, D S. The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets[J]. Yale Journal on Regulation, 2003,20: 325-381.
8Armstrong,M. Competition in two-sided markets[EB/OL]. IDEI, 2004.
9Hagiu, A. Two-sided platforms: pricing and social efficiency[EB/OL]. IDEI, 2005.
10Caillaud,B and B Jullien. Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2002,24 : 309-328.