期刊文献+

事业单位绩效管理实践公平性的实证研究——来自河北省某地勘单位的经验 被引量:10

An Empirical Study on the Fairness of Performance Management Practice in Public Institutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 事业单位绩效管理实践的公平性是决定绩效管理能否在人事制度改革中发挥作用的关键因素。来自河北省某地勘单位294名员工的问卷调查显示,目标参与性、绩效工资、绩效奖励对结果公平有显著正向影响,工作反馈则有显著负向影响;目标确定性、目标参与性、工作支持、绩效考评对程序公平有显著正向影响;目标确定性、目标参与性、工作支持、绩效考评、绩效奖励对互动公平有显著正向影响,绩效工资则有显著负向影响。由此,从绩效管理的计划准备、沟通辅导、绩效考评与绩效反馈四个方面,提出了提升事业单位绩效管理实践公平性的相关对策建议。 The fairness of performance management practice in public institutions has been regarded as a key role in the reform of the cadre and personnel system. Based on 294 questionnaires from Hebei Province, this research finds that goal participations, performance-based pay and performance-based bonus have a positive influence on the result fairness while work feedback have a negatively influence; goal certainty, goal participation, work support and performance appraisal have a positive influence on the procedural fairness; goal certainty, goal participation, work support and performance appraisal and performance-based bonus have a positive influence on the interactive fairness while performance-based pay have a negatively influence. Based on these empirical results, this paper sets forth the related countermeasures for improving the fairness of performance management practice in public institutions from four aspects of making-plan, communication and counseling, performance appraisal and performance feedback.
作者 赵晨 高中华
出处 《北京行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期7-12,共6页 Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金 人力资源和社会保障部事业单位人事管理司项目 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71302119 71302170) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(13YJC630036)
关键词 事业单位 绩效管理实践 绩效管理公平性 public institutions performance management practice fairness of performance management
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1MASTERSON S S, LEWIS K, GOLDMAN B M. Inte- grating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Ef- fects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Rela- tionships [J]. Academy of Management Journal. 2000, 43 (4): 738-748.
  • 2GILEENBERG J. Organizational Justice: Yesterday, To- day, and Tomorrow[J]. Journal of Management. 1990, 16 (2): 399-432.
  • 3ADAMS J S. Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances inExperimental Social Psychology, Berkowitz L[C]//.New York: Academic Press, 1965: 2, 267-299.
  • 4THIBAUT J, WALKER L. Procedural Justice: A Psy- :hological Analysis[M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1975.
  • 5LEVENTHAL G S, KARUZA J, FRY W R. Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences. Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contribu- tions from Psychological Research, Mikula G [C]//.New York: Springer-Verlag New York, 1980: 3, 167-218.
  • 6BIES R J, MOAG J S. Interactional Justice: Communi- cation Criteria of Fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Lewicki R J, Sheppard B H, Bazerman M, Greenwich[C]//.CT:JAI Press, 1986:43-55.
  • 7HACKMAN J R, OLDHAM G R. Work Redesign. Reading[M].MA: Addison-Wesley, 1980.
  • 8CHEN X P, PILLUTLA M M, YAO X. Unintended Consequences of Cooperation Inducing and Maintain- ing Mechanisms in Public Goods Dilemmas: Sanctions and Moral Appeals [J]. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2009, 12(2): 241-255.

同被引文献44

引证文献10

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部