对文轨疏若干问题的考证

A Historical Probe into Academic Gains and Losses of Wenguishu in Tang Dynasty

文轨疏是唐代非常重要的一部因明学著作,其地位仅次于窥基的《因明大疏》。由于史料缺乏,有关文轨的生平事迹已不可考,而且文轨疏流传至今也已非完帙,留下诸多悬而未决的问题。对文轨疏的成书时间、卷数、散佚的时间以及《因明论理门十四过类疏》的作者问题等进行考证,有助于对文轨疏有一个更为深入的了解。

Wenguishu(Wengui's Commentary) is a very important work on Logic into Syllogism in Tang dynasty and its academic status is only next to Kuiji's work The Commentary on Hetuvidya, a theory about logic. Due to lack of historical records,nothing has been known about Wengui's life story so far and his work doesn't remain intact, resulting in some academic questions in suspense. This paper deals mainly with the time the work was done, the number of volumes it included, the time it was lost, and the authorship of the work Commentary on Fourteen Fallacies in Hetuvidya so as to have a better understanding of the work.