期刊文献+

行政决策责任追究程序启动标准问题研究 被引量:6

A Study on the Program Starts Standards of the Administrative Decision-Making Accountability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合法正当有效的程序是行政决策责任追究走向法治轨道健康、持续发展的保证。假如责任追究是一条河流,正义是河水,那么程序就是堤岸。具体的程序性规定就是堤岸上一道道闸口,控制河水的流速与方向。行政决策责任追究程序启动标准和行政决策失误的评判标准,可谓是一体两面。也就是说,凡是行政决策不当导致决策失误的,就应当启动责任追究程序,追究相应主体的责任。但是,现实既有程序启动标准的模糊性,使得行政决策责任追究充满了随意性、情绪化,甚至戏剧性。必须从过程和结果导向出发,进一步细化程序启动的具体标准。 It is an inseparable protection for benign implementation of any system to have a rigorous, de- tailed procedures. And the more emphasis on the rule of law society, the more attention should be paid to programs. The proper legal procedures are the healthy and sustainable guarantee for the effective adminis- trative decision-making accountability development towards the rule of law track. If accountability is a riv- er, just a river water, then the program is the embankment. Specific procedural provision is a road on the embankment gates, which controls the flow rate and direction of the river. The procedures start standards of the administrative decision-making accountability and the evaluation criteria of the administrative mis- takes can be described as one of the two sides. In other words, if any improper administrative decision make mistakes, you should start the process of accountability to investigate the responsibility of the appro- priate body. However, in reality, the program start-standards are fuzzy, which make administrative deci- sions accountability random, emotional, and even dramatic. So we must depart from the process and re- suits-oriented, and further refine the program starts and quantify specific criteria.
作者 王仰文
机构地区 聊城大学法学院
出处 《辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第3期340-344,共5页 Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 山东省哲学社会科学基金项目(J09WK12)
关键词 行政决策 责任追究 追究标准 制度建设 administrative decision accountability accountability standards institution building
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

共引文献26

同被引文献37

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部