期刊文献+

论西方课程研究的复杂性转向 被引量:8

On the Complexity Turn of the Western Curriculum Studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 西方课程研究的复杂性取向兴起于20世纪90年代,这场课程研究的范式转向是在"概念重建运动"逐步深入、对现代课程理论进行全面反思与批判的背景下,借鉴复杂理论、混沌理论等研究复杂系统的研究成果对现代课程研究中简单思维的自发纠偏,进而实现课程研究的复杂性自觉的跨学科对话。深入分析这场课程研究范式变革的主要观点与核心论题有必要从其课程研究的本体论、认识论以及知识论三个维度来剖析这场复杂性转向的旨趣与意义。 The complexity turn of western curriculum research emerged in the 1990s, this curricu- lum research paradigm shift was to utilize the complexity theory, chaos theory and other researches on complex systems to correct the simplification thinking in the modem curriculum study spontane- ously, then to realize the interdisciplinary dialogue between curriculum studies and complexity theo- ry consciously which based on the movement of the "Reconceptualism" and the reflection on the modem curriculum. To understand the main points of this paradigm turn of curriculum studies, the three dimensions of ontology, epistemology and methodology would be chosen to understand the pur- port and significance of this complexity turn.
作者 张良 陈玥
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期3-10,共8页 Global Education
基金 国家留学基金委以及华东师范大学"博士研究生新人奖"资助
关键词 课程范式 课程研究 复杂性转向 复杂理论 curriculum paradigm curriculum research complexity turn complexity theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1张华.走向课程理解:西方课程理论新进展[J].全球教育展望,2001,30(7):40-48. 被引量:109
  • 2Deborah Osberg and Gert J. J. Biesta. Beyond Re/Presentation : A Case for Updating the Epistemolo- gy of Schooling [ J ]. Interchange : A Quarterly Review of Education,2008,38 ( 1 ) : 15 - 29.
  • 3Keith Morrison. Complexity theory and curriculum reforms in Hong Kong [J]. Pedagogy, Culture & Socie- ty,2003, ( 11 )2:279 - 302.
  • 4张良.从简单性到复杂性——试论我国教学范式的重建[J].清华大学教育研究,2013,34(5):103-108. 被引量:33
  • 5Deborah Osberg and Gert J. J. Biesta. Beyond Presence: Epistemological and Pedagogical Implications of 'Strong' Emergence [J]. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education,2007,38( 1 ) :31 -51.
  • 6William E. Doll, M. Jayne Fleener, Donna Trueit, John St Julien. Chaos, Complexity, Curriculum, and Culture : A Conversation [ C ]. New York : Peter Lang Publishing, 2005:2 - 3, 3 - 4.
  • 7Donna Trueit, William E. Doll. Jr. Thinking complexly: Being -in -relation [ A]. Deborah Osberg and Gert Biesta. Complexity Theory and the Politics of Education [ C]. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers,2010:135.
  • 8Deborah Osberg, Gert J. J. Biesta, Paul Cilliers. From Representation to Emergence : Complexi- ty' s challenge to the epistemology of schooling [ A ].Mark Mason. Complexity Theory and The Philosophy of Education [ C ]. West Sussex: John Wiley&Sons Ltd,2008:204 - 218.
  • 9Noel Gough. Complexity, Complexity Reduction, and Methodological Borrowing in Educational Inquiry [ J ]. Complicity:An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2012( 1 ) :41 -56.
  • 10Michel Alhadeff- Jones. Method and Complexity in Educational Sciences [ J]. Complicity :An Internation- al Journal of Complexity and Education ,2013 ( 1/2 ) : 1 - 7.

二级参考文献6

共引文献144

同被引文献91

引证文献8

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部