期刊文献+

循证医学中PICO模型的扩展及其在定性研究中的应用 被引量:47

Expansion of PICO Model in Evidence-based Medicine and Its Application in Qualitative Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 PICO模型是循证医学中构建问题的通用模型,然而随着医学研究的不断深入、细化及定性研究的兴起,PICO模型已经不能满足全部医学问题的构建。因此,本文在PICO模型的基础之上对其进行了扩展,并针对定性研究介绍了SPIDER模型,从而使临床工作者能在短时间内构建出临床问题,并为问题的检索提供最佳策略。 The PICO model is a general model in building problems of evidence-based medicine (EBM). However, with the deepening and refinement of the medical research and the rising of qualitative research, the PICO model could not satisfy all problems. This article introduces the expansions of the PICO model and puts forward the SPIDER model according to the qualitative problem and its relationship with the PICO model, which can build the best search strategy of clinical problems in a short time.
作者 孙皓 时景璞
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2014年第5期505-508,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 循证医学 PICO模型 定性研究 SPIDER模型 Evidence-based medicine (EBM) PICO model Qualitative research SPIDER model
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, et al. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club, 1995, 123(3): A12-A13.
  • 2Scherer S, Smith MB. Research Corner Teaching Evidence-based Practice in Academic and Clinical Settings. Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Journal, 2002, 13(2): 23-27.
  • 3Law MC, MacDermid J. Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice. Slack Incorporated, 2008.
  • 4Neville K, Horbatt S. Evidence-based practice: creating a spirit of inquiry to solve clinical nursing problems. Orthop Nurs, 2008, 27(6): 331-337, 338-339.
  • 5Armstrong EC. The well-built clinical question: the key to finding the best evidence efficiently. WMJ, 1999, 98(2): 25-28.
  • 6Cheng GY. A study of clinical questions posed by hospital clinicians. J Med Libr Assoc, 2004, 92(4): 445-458.
  • 7Booth A, O’Rourke AJ, Ford NJ. Structuring the pre-search reference interview: a useful technique for handling clinical questions. Bull Med Libr Assoc, 2000, 88(3): 239-246.
  • 8Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2006: 359-363.
  • 9Booth A. Cochrane or cock-eyed? How should we conduct systematic reviews of qualitative research? 2001.
  • 10Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, McKoy NA. Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol, 2011, 64(12): 1325-1330.

同被引文献535

引证文献47

二级引证文献393

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部