期刊文献+

教学方法的理解误区、概念重建及其构建策略——基于知识论的视角 被引量:6

On the Misunderstanding,Conceptual Reconstruction and Practice Strategies of the Teaching Method:Perspective of the Theory of Knowledge
原文传递
导出
摘要 审视实践与理论层面对教学方法的理解误区具体表现为:将其误解为普遍性知识、公共性知识以及程序性知识。摆脱教学方法理解误区及其所引发的实践困境有必要就教学方法的理解实现概念重建,有必要从教学方法是一种境遇性知识、个人性知识以及策略性知识三个维度理解。实现教学方法概念重建的构建策略则包括:将教学方法嵌入课堂情境、将教学方法纳入教师研究以及将教学方法融入学科知识等。 The misunderstandings with the teaching method are as follow: the understanding of teaching methods as universality knowledge, as public knowledge and as procedural knowledge. To get rid of these misunderstanding and practice difficulties caused by the misunderstanding is necessary to achieve the concept of reconstruction about the teaching method; the ways of the reconstruction are as follows: the teaching method as a situational knowledge, personal knowledge and strategic knowledge in three dimensions. So, the practice strategies for the reconstruction of the teaching methods may include: put the teaching method to embed into the classroom situation, put the teaching method into teacher research and put teaching method will to integrate with into the subject matter.
作者 张良 乐维英
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第8期18-22,共5页 Research in Educational Development
基金 华东师范大学"博士研究生学术新人奖"资助的部分成果
关键词 教学方法 课程知识 教师学习 知识论视角 teaching method, curriculum knowledge, teacher learning, perspective of the theory of knowledge
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1张华.试论教学方法的理智传统[J].全球教育展望,2009,38(6):7-16. 被引量:17
  • 2Bernard Ricca.Beyond Teaching Method:A Complexity Approach[J].Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2012, (2):31-51.
  • 3张良.从简单性到复杂性——试论我国教学范式的重建[J].清华大学教育研究,2013,34(5):103-108. 被引量:33
  • 4William E. Doll.Beyond Methods? Teaching as an Aesthetic and Spiritfull Quest[A].E.Mirochnik & D.Sherman.Passion and Pedagogy: Relation, Creation, and Transformation in Teaching[C].New York: Peter Lang, 2002.127-151.
  • 5王策三.教学论稿[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1985..
  • 6John Dewey. Democracy and Education[M].Radford: Wilder Publications, 2005,148,150,151,152,171-172,151-152.
  • 7[捷]夸美纽斯.大教学论[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1999..
  • 8Edward L.Dejnozka, David E. Kapel. American Educators'Encyclopedia[M].New York: Greenwood Press,1982. 519-520.
  • 9张华.课程与教学论[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2001.474-484.
  • 10张良.反思我国教学实践变革中的简单性思维--以杜郎口中学为个案[J].中国教育学刊,2012(9):36-38. 被引量:10

二级参考文献32

  • 1王策三.认真对待“轻视知识”的教育思潮——再评由“应试教育”向素质教育转轨提法的讨论[J].北京大学教育评论,2004,2(3):5-23. 被引量:545
  • 2张华.论“设计本位学习”[J].教育发展研究,2006,26(23):1-7. 被引量:15
  • 3Doll, W. E., Jr. (2005). The Culture of Method. In Doll, W. E., Jr., Fleener, M. J., Trueit, D. , & St. Julien, J. (eds.) (2005). Chaos, Complexity, Curriculum, and Culture: A Conversation. New York: Peter Lang. 27,58,21 - 75,22,27,35,46,55.
  • 4Doll, W. E., Jr. (2005). The Culture of Method. In Doll, W. E., Jr., Fleener, M. J., Trueit, D. , & St. Julien, J. (eds.) (2005). Chaos, Complexity, Curriculum, and Culture: A Conversation. New York: Peter Lang. 26.
  • 5[捷]夸美纽斯.大教学论·教学法解析[J].任钟印译.北京:人民教育出版社,2006:5,104,118-166,288,262,152,65,317-318
  • 6Ramus, Peter (1969). Dialectic.
  • 7Ong, W. (1983). Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. P. 3.
  • 8Bacon, F. (2000). The new organon. L. Jardine and X Silverthome ( Trans. ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Doll, W. E., Jr. (2005). The Culture of Method. In Doll, W. E., Jr., Fleener, M. J., Trueit, D. , & St. Julien, J. (eds.) (2005). Chaos, Complexity, Curriculum, and Culture: A Conversation. New York: Peter Lang.p.38.
  • 10Descartes, R. (1950). Discourse on Method. L. Lafleur (Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. P. 12.

共引文献798

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部