期刊文献+

公司内部治理水平与公司风险承担间的动态关系——基于动态内生性的经验研究 被引量:3

The Dynamics Relationship between Corporate Governance Level and Corporate Risk-Taking ——Based on the Empirical Studies of Dynamics Endogenous Dongbei University of Finance and Economics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2002—2011年716家上市公司为样本,在动态内生性的框架下,运用动态面板的System GMM估计方法,同时考虑了三种内生性,以动态性视角研究了公司治理水平与公司风险承担间的关系。研究发现:(1)公司治理水平与公司风险承担正相关;(2)公司治理水平不仅对公司风险承担有短期影响,而且还有长期影响,提高公司治理水平对公司风险承担影响的持续时间大约为4—5年;(3)前期公司风险承担对当期公司治理水平有反馈效应;(4)公司治理水平与公司风险承担间存在动态内生性。 In this paper,716 listed companies range from 2002 to 2011 are used as our sample. In the framework of dynamic endogeneity,we use the dynamic System GMM model,taking into account the three kinds of endogeneity at the same time,based on a dynamic perspective to study the relationship between corporate governance level and corporate risk-taking. And we reach the following conclusion:(a) Corporate governance level has a significant positive relationship with corporate risk-taking;(b) Corporate governance level not only has a short-term effects on corporate risk-taking,but also has a long-term effects on corporate risk-taking,which lasts about 4—5 years;(c) Prior corporate risk-taking has a significant effect on current corporate governance level;(d) There is dynamics endogeneity problem between corporate governance level and corporate risktaking.
机构地区 东北财经大学
出处 《南京财经大学学报》 2014年第2期83-91,共9页 Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
关键词 公司治理水平 公司风险承担 动态内生性 Corporate Governance Level Corporate Risk-taking Dynamic Endogeneity
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1BOUBAKRI N, COSSET J C, SAFFAR W. The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evi- dence from privatization [ J ]. Journal of Financial Eco- nomics ,2013.
  • 2WINTOKI M B, LINCK J S, NETTER J M. Endogene- ity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 105 ( 3 ) : 581 - 606.
  • 3NAKANO M, NGUYEN P. Board size and corporate risk taking : further evidence from Japan [ J ]. Corporate Governance : An International Review,2012,20 (4) : 369 - 387.
  • 4KIM K H, BUCHANAN R. CEO duality leadership and firm risk-taking propensity [ J ]. Journal of Applied Busi- ness Research (JABR) ,2011,2d( 1 ).
  • 5BROCKMAN P, MARTIN X, Unlu E. Executive com- pensation and the maturity structure of corporate debt [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65 (3) : 1123 - 1161.
  • 6CHEN Y R, MAY. Revisiting the risk-taking effect of executive stock options on firm performance[ J]. Journal of business research,2011,64 (6) : 640 - 648.
  • 7强国令.管理层股权激励是否降低了公司过度投资——来自股权分置改革的经验证据[J].投资研究,2012,31(2):31-43. 被引量:23
  • 8NGUYEN T, LOCKE S, Reddy K. A Dynamic Estima- tion of Governance Structures and Financial Performance for Singaporean Companies [ J ]. Available at SSRN 2314773,2013.
  • 9周翼翔.股权结构与公司绩效:基于动态内生性视角的经验证据[J].经济管理,2012,38(1):71-82. 被引量:27
  • 10余明桂,李文贵,潘红波.管理者过度自信与企业风险承担[J].金融研究,2013(1):149-163. 被引量:762

二级参考文献139

共引文献2937

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部