期刊文献+

基于前景理论的改进多路径交通分配模型 被引量:8

Improved Multi-path Assignment Model Based on Prospect Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的多路径分配模型只考虑路径的出行时间而忽略交通政策的引导作用,同时也无法考虑出行者主观因素对路径选择的影响,以及Logit模型的IIA特性.本研究考虑出行者在路径选择情况下的有限理性因素,并试图克服Logit模型的缺点,结合前景理论和Probit模型,建立了改进的多路径交通分配模型;结合拥挤收费政策,以一个算例分析模型参数变化对路径选择的影响;最后在参数确定的情况下,得到近似最优收费标准.结果表明,模型能够体现路网中交通流的分配,也能体现拥挤收费政策对路网流量的影响;参数θ越大,主导路径的优势越明显,当θ等于1.5时,近似最优收费标准为1.19元. Traditional multi-path assignment model only considers route travel time and seldom takes the impact of traffic policy into account.Besides,the impact of traveller' s subjective factors on route choice and Logit model' s property of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives are also beyond consideration.Based on prospect theory and Probit model,this paper develops an improved multi-path assignment model trying to consider traveller' s bounded rationality under route choice making and to overcome the disadvantage of Logit model.A numerical example with congestion pricing policy is proposed to analyze the impact of parameter' s change of the model on route choice,and the approximately optimal pricing point is obtained under fixed parameter.The results show that the model can reflect assignment of traffic flows in the network and the impact of congestion pricing policy; the advantage of dominant path increases with the parameter θ growing; when θ equals 1.5,the approximately optimal pricing point is 1.19 RMB.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期162-167,共6页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(51278087 51378091) 辽宁省教育厅科学研究一般项目(L2012026)
关键词 城市交通 多路径分配模型 前景理论 PROBIT模型 拥挤收费 urban transportation multi-path assignment model prospect theory Probit model congestion pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献58

  • 1曾建敏.实验检验累积前景理论[J].暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版),2007,28(1):44-47. 被引量:58
  • 2马超群,王玉萍,陈宽民,严宝杰.基于灰色加权关联度的城市轨道线网方案评价[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(3):84-87. 被引量:27
  • 3赵凛,张星臣.基于“前景理论”的路径选择行为建模及实例分析[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(7):82-86. 被引量:29
  • 4曹守华,袁振洲,李艳红,吴先宇.交通流诱导条件下的路网随机平衡双层规划模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(4):36-42. 被引量:6
  • 5WARDROP J G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research[J]. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, 1952, 1(2):325-378.
  • 6DAGANZO C F, SHEFFI Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment [ J ]. Transportation Science, 1977( 11 ) : 253-274.
  • 7NAGURNEY A. A multiclass, multicriteria traffic network equilibrium model[ J ]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2000, 32(3): 393-411.
  • 8van LINT J W C, van ZUYLEN H J, TU H. Travel time unreliability on freeways: why measures based on variance tell only half the story[J]. Transport Research : Part A, 2008, 42 ( 1 ) : 258-277.
  • 9ANTHONY C, ZHOU Z. The a-reliable mean-excess traffic: equilibrium model with stochastic travel times[J]. Transport Research: Part B, 2010, 44(4) : 493-513.
  • 10SIMON H A. Behavioral model of rational choice[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1955, 69( 1 ) : 99-118.

共引文献135

同被引文献78

引证文献8

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部