期刊文献+

基于QoE的VoIP带宽分配机制研究 被引量:2

Research on QoE-based Bandwidth Allocation Mechanism for VoIP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用比例积分微分(PID)控制理论控制IP语音(VoIP)数据流带宽需求和用户体验(QoE)之间的平衡关系,并将该信息纳入带宽再分配模型中,提出一个基于QoE的带宽分配机制QBAV(QoE-based bandwidth allocation mechanism for VoIP application),它在满足用户期望QoE的同时兼顾带宽分配的公平性。理论证明该算法满足非线性问题最优化约束条件,所分配带宽满足目标函数全局收敛。仿真结果表明,该算法分别以低于传统NRG算法9%及最新FC-MDI-S算法15%的带宽满足了90%以上用户的期望QoE,避免了现有带宽分配机制针对小部分高优先级数据流的弊端,提高了VoIP业务的整体性能及网络利用效率。 This paper used the Proportional Integrative Derivative (PID) control theory to allow a controlled trade-off between the bandwidth requirement of the VoIP data stream and its Quality of user Experience (QoE),then quantifying the perception in the bandwidth reallocation model,proposed a QoE-based bandwidth allocation mechanism for VoIP (QBAV),which maximizes the fairness between users while targeting the expected QoE.This paper proved the global optimum of the algorithm.The simulation shows that the proposed algorithm can meet about 90% of users,comparing with the NRG algorithm and the latest FC-MDI-S algorithm,and the bandwidth cuts down 9% and 15% respectively.The existing algorithms rely on minor high priority data streams.Avoiding this problem,the proposed algorithm enhances the overall performance of VoIP and the network efficiency.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期102-106,共5页 Computer Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61261024 61162010) 海南大学社会服务专项基金项目(HDSF201301)资助
关键词 带宽分配机制 QOE VOIP PID Bandwidth allocation mechanism QoE VoIP PID
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1林闯,胡杰,孔祥震.用户体验质量(QoE)的模型与评价方法综述[J].计算机学报,2012,35(1):1-15. 被引量:152
  • 2Jalali A,Padovani R,Pankaj R,et al.Data throughput of CDMA-HDR a high efficiency-high data rate personal communication wireless system[C]//Proc.of IEEE VTC 2000 Spring.Tokyo,Japan,2000:1663-1667.
  • 3Singh K,Ros D.Normalized rate guarantee scheduler for High Speed Downlink Packet Access[C]//Proc.of IEEE GLOBECOM'07.Washington D C,USA,2007:576-580.
  • 4Singh K,Orozco J,Ros D,et al.Improving perceived streamingvideo quality in High Speed Downlink Packet Access[C]//Proc.of IEEE GLOBECOM 2008.New Orleans,USA,2008:1-6.
  • 5Yuan Xue,Li B,Nahrstedt K,et al.Optimal resource allocation in wireless Ad Hoc networks:a Price-based approach[J].IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing,2006,5(4):347-364.
  • 6Wang X.QoS Mechanism for WLAN Based on PIDControl[C]// 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology(CIT).IEEE,Chengdu,China,2012:892-894.
  • 7Cicconetti C,Gardellin V,Lenzini L,et al.End-to-End Ban& width Reservation in IEEE 802.16 Mesh Networks[C]//Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems,2007(MASS 2007).Pisa,Italy,2007:1-6.
  • 8Comaniciu C,VncentPoor H.On the capacity of mobile Ad Hoc networks with delay constraints[J].IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,2006,5(8):2061-2071.
  • 9Shrma G,Mazumdar R,Shroff N B,et al.Delay and capacity tradeoffs in mobile Ad Hoc networks:a global Perspective[J].IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking,2007,15(5):981-992.
  • 10张大陆,曹孝晶,胡治国.基于用户体验评价模型的最优路由选择算法[J].计算机应用,2012,32(10):2683-2688. 被引量:7

二级参考文献90

  • 1兰帆,张尧弼.基于Gilbert模型的网络丢包仿真[J].计算机工程,2004,30(B12):200-201. 被引量:7
  • 2Software tools for speech and audio coding standardization[EB/ OL]. http://www, itu. int/rec/T-REC-G. 191-200509-I/en.
  • 3ITU-T Test signals for telecommunication systems[EB/OL]. http://www, itu. int/net/itu-t/sigdb/genaudio/AudioForm-g. aspx? val =1000050.
  • 4Perlicki K. Simple analysis of the impact of packet loss and delay on voice transmission quality[J]. Journal of telecommunications and information technology, 2002 : 53-56.
  • 5Mohamed S, Rubino G, Varela M. A method for quantitative evaluation of audio quality over packet networks and its comparison with existing techniques[A]//Measurement of Speech and Audio Quality in Networks(MESAQIN) [C]. Prague, 2004.
  • 6Cole R G, Rosenbluth J H. Voice over IP performance monitoring[J]. Computer Communication Review, 2001,31 (2) : 9-24.
  • 7ITU-T Recommendation G. 113(2002). Transmission impairments due to speech processing[S]. International Telecommunication Union-Telecommunication Standardisation Sector. May 2002.
  • 8ITU-T Recommendation G. 113 Appendix 1(2002). Provisional planning values for the equipment impairment factor Ie and packet-loss robustness factor Bpl[S]. International Telecommunication Union-Telecommunication Standardization Sector, May 2002.
  • 9DataFit9. 0 http://www, oakdaleengr, com/.
  • 10Rahrer T, Fiandra R, Wright S. Triple-play Services Quality of Experience(QoE) Requirements and Mechanisrns[M]. DSL Forum Working Text WT-126,February 2006.

共引文献161

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部