S法优于EP法(英文)
Superiority of S Method to EP Method
摘要
通过比较发现:在席位总数固定时,S法优于EP法.因为在向量空间中,S法的方案始终离理想分配份额最近.
By means of comparison, it is found that the S method far excels the EP method because the scheme of the former is the nearest from the ideal distribution in the vector space.
出处
《绍兴文理学院学报》
2014年第7期1-7,共7页
Journal of Shaoxing University
参考文献10
-
1Michel L Balinski, H Peyton Young. Fair Representation : Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote [ M ]. Yale University Press, 1982 : 191.
-
2BALINSKI M L,Young H P. Fair Representation in the European Parliament[ J ]. Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, 1982,20 (4) : 361 - 373.
-
3BalinskiMichel , Ramirez Victoriano. Parametric methods of apportionment, rounding and production [ J ]. Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, 1999, 37 (2) : 107 - 122.
-
4Balinski, Michel & Jennings, Andrew & Laraki, Rida . Monotonic incompatibility between electing and ranking [ J ]. Economics Letters, Elsevier,2009,105 (2) : 145 - 147.
-
5Richard E. Berg- Andersson ,Tony Roza, 2010 Census State Population and the Distribution of Electoral Votes and Representatives.
-
6Foster Robert (1895). Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States: Historical and Judicial. 1. Boston: The Boston Book Co.. pp. 329 - 446.
-
7Hamilton, Alexander; Madison, James ; Jay, John ( 1831 ). The Federalist. Hallowell : Glazier, Masters & Co.. ISBN 0 - 8239 - 5735 - 7.
-
8Edelman, Paul H. (2006)." Getting the Math Right: Why California Has Too Many Seats in the House of Representatives" Vanderbih Law Review ( Nashville : Vanderbih University) 102 (March) : 297.
-
9Charles Kromkowski and John A Kromkowski; Kromkowski, John A ( 1991 ) Why 435. A Question of Po- litical Arithmetic" (PDF). Polity 24 (Fall 1991 ) : 129 - 145. doi:10.2307/3234988. JSTOR 3234988. http ://www. thirty - thousand, org/documents/Kromkowski_Fall1991, pdf. Retrieved 2009 - 06 - 22.
-
10Sun,Jianxin. "On Fair Distribution of Discrete Resources[ J ]. Journal of Shaoxing University ,2013,33 (9) : 8 - 22.
-
1裘贇辰,王臻臻,秦衍.带跳的非线性随机延迟微分方程的Split-step算法[J].华东理工大学学报（自然科学版）,2014,40(6):810-816.
-
2张建勋.席位分配问题的数学模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2002,32(4):541-548. 被引量：14
-
3杨学伟,刘红卫.“席位分配问题的数学模型”的一个注解[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(17):98-99.
-
4杨国武.席位的公平分配数学模型[J].武汉交通科技大学学报,1999,23(3):318-321. 被引量：5
-
5Matt Flynn.Circles AND CYCLES[J].China's Tibet,2016,27(2):50-55.
-
6胡绪腾,宋迎东.应用总应变-应变能区分法预测热机械疲劳寿命[J].燃气涡轮试验与研究,2012,25(1):14-16. 被引量：4
-
7王战伟,余欢欢.席位公平分配的标准差法[J].新乡学院学报,2012,29(3):197-199. 被引量：3
-
8钱丽丽,邓桂丰.一个公平分配席位的新方案[J].数学的实践与认识,2012,42(18):13-20. 被引量：1
-
9梁丹.公平的席位分配问题[J].本溪冶金高等专科学校学报,2001,3(1):52-53.
-
10敖力布.白洞的来龙去脉[J].现代物理知识,1992,4(3):40-41.
