期刊文献+

615例宫颈液基薄层细胞学临床应用研究 被引量:1

The chincal application study of 615 cases cervical ThinPrep cytology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过对高校女教职工宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查(TCT)结果分析,了解该群体宫颈病变的发生情况以及TCT的临床应用价值和意义。方法:采用TCT法,对我校615名年龄在20~76岁女教职工体检者进行筛查,以病理组织学检查作为评价和诊断标准。结果:TCT检测与病理组织学检查比对检出符合率高,而且病理级别越高,符合率越高。ASC-H符合率为66.67%、LSIL符合率为87.50%,HSIL、SCC的符合率为100%。在宫颈病变各年龄组构成比分析中,高校女教职工在40~49岁年龄组患病较高,各年龄组构成依次为3.45%、4.89%、10.32%、2.56%,经统计学分析40~49岁组与各年龄组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:TCT宫颈检查法对宫颈病变的筛查具有重要的临床应用价值和意义,值得推广。 Objective:To discuss the occurrence of cervical lesions by means of analysis based on 615 subjects of the university female staff of Thinprep Cytologic Test (TCT). Methods:Using TCT method,615 students in our university at the age of 20-76 years old female staff physical examination for screening , the histopathological examination as the evaluation and diagnostic criteria . Results:TCT detection and pathological examination on the coincidence rate is high,and the pathological grades higher,the coincidence rate is higher. ASC-H coincidence rate was 66.67%, LSIL coincidence rate was 87.50%,HSIL,SCC with the rate of 100%. In cervical lesions in each age group in constituent ratio analysis,the university female staff higher prevalence in the 40 to 49 age group,each age group were 3.45%,4.89%,10.32%,2.56%,the statistical analysis 40-49 years old group and each age group were significantly different(P〈0.05). Conclusion:Clinical significance of TCT examination of cervical screening results of cervical lesions, worthy of promotion.
作者 岳兰 张纯
出处 《甘肃医药》 2014年第5期321-323,共3页 Gansu Medical Journal
关键词 液基薄层细胞学(TCT) 宫颈病变 检出率 Thinprep Cytologic Test cervical lesions detection rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1苏涛,章桂红,程利南.液基薄层细胞学技术在宫颈病变筛查中的应用及评价[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),2004,31(4):252-255. 被引量:112
  • 2吕卫国,谢幸.宫颈癌的筛查[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(1):8-9. 被引量:95
  • 3邹倩,濮德敏.液基超薄细胞检测结合TBS系统检测1583例宫颈涂片的临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(4):480-482. 被引量:11
  • 4Sulik SM, Kroeger K, Schultz JK, et al. Are fluid-based cytologies superior to the conventional papanicolaou test? a systematic review. J Fam Pract, 2001,50(12):1040-1046.
  • 5Ries L, Kosary C, Hanky B, et al. SEER cancer statistics review,1973~1995. Bethesda,MD:National Cancer Institute, 1998.
  • 6Hutchinson ML, Cassin CM, Ball HG. The efficacy of an automated preparation device for cervical cytology. Am J Clin Pathol, 1991,96(3):300-305.
  • 7Sprenger E, Schwarzmann P, Kirkpatrick M, et al. The false negative rate in cervical cytology. Acta Cytol, 1996,40(1):81-89.
  • 8Pajtler M, Audy-Jurkovic S. Pap smear adequacy-is the assessing criterion induding endocervical cells really valid? Coll Antropol, 2002,26(2):565-570.
  • 9Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, et al. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cancer,2003,99(6):331-335.
  • 10Abulafia O, Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM. Performance of ThinPrep liquidbased cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quant itative survey. Gynecol Oncol, 2003,90(1):137-144.

共引文献128

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部