期刊文献+

论行政诉讼非法证据类型

Study on the Types of Illegal Evidence in Administrative Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非法证据排除规则最早在美国确立并得到发展,形成一套比较完整的体系。我国对非法证据排除规则的探讨很长时期仅停留在理论阶段,2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改中采纳并确立这一证据规则,使其从理论探讨变为实践,也为行政诉讼非法证据排除规则的探讨提供了很好的借鉴。目前,行政诉讼法正处于修改时期,以现有的法律规范为基础探讨行政诉讼非法证据的类型及其判断标准显得尤为必要。 The illegal evidence,exclusionary rule was first established and developed to a relatively complete system in the United States, China's illegal evidence exclusion rules discussion only stay in the theoretical stage in a very long time,but in 2012,Criminal Procedure Law adopted and established the rides of evidence from theory into practlce,thls also provides a good reference of exclusionary rule for illegal evidence in administrative litigation. Currently ,the administrative procedure law is in the modification peried,based on the existing legal norms,study on the types and the judgment standard of illegal evidence in administrative litigation is necessaxy.
作者 陶磊
机构地区 华侨大学法学院
出处 《重庆交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第2期38-41,共4页 Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 行政诉讼 非法证据类型 判断标准 administrative litigation types of illegal evidence judgment standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部