期刊文献+

输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的现状与进展 被引量:47

Current state and advance of flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of upper urinary calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 泌尿系结石是泌尿外科最常见的疾病之一,其中多数为上尿路结石。受硬件条件限制,传统微创治疗方法的安全性和有效性均存在一定局限。相对而言,输尿管镜治疗上尿路结石因通过自然腔道进入肾脏,并在直视下进行碎石,故具有微创、安全、恢复快、碎石效率高等优点。近年来随着输尿管软镜技术及相关碎石辅助设备的快速发展,输尿管软镜碎石成为临床上治疗上尿路结石的理想选择。随着技术的进步及其普及推广,可以预见,输尿管软镜将成为未来治疗上尿路结石的主流术式。本文将从安全性、适应证等多方面介绍输尿管软镜治疗上尿路结石的安全性和有效性及相关技巧,以期有助于输尿管软镜技术的进一步普及推广。 Urinary calculus is one of the most common diseases in urinary surgery, and most cases are upper urinary calcu- li. Limited by the physical conditions, there still exist defects in the safety and efficacy of traditional minimal invasive therapy. Flexible ureteroscope is minimal invasive, safe and efficient because it enters through natural tract and calculi are removed un- der direct vision. With rapid development of ureteroscopic technique and equipment, flexible ureteroscope has become an ideal therapeutic option for upper urinary calculi in recent years. In the near future, it will be the mainstream operating type in the treatment of upper urinary calculi. This article will introduce the safety, efficiency and relevant skills of flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of upper urinary calculi.
作者 程跃 刘冠琳
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2014年第5期285-288,共4页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 上尿路结石 输尿管软镜 安全性 有效性 碎石 upper urinary calculi flexible ureteroscope security efficiency lithotripsy
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1叶章群,邓耀良,董诚.泌尿系结石[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:100-102.
  • 2MAURICE S, LUTZ T, JENS R, et al. Complications in percu- taneousnephrolithotomy [J]. Europ Urol,2007, 51 (4): 899- 906.
  • 3HUSSAIN M, ACHER P, PENEV B, et al. Redefining the lim- its of flexible ureterorenoscopy [J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25 (1) : 45-49.
  • 4MARCELLO C, JOSE R, COLOMBO JR, et ai. Outcomes offlexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with holmium laser for upper u- rinary tract calculi [J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2008, 34(2) : 143-149.
  • 5程跃,施小东,胡嘉盛,严泽军.电子输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术[J].中国内镜杂志,2011,17(2):212-214. 被引量:89
  • 6SAUSSINE C. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J]. Prog Urol,2013,23(14) : 1168-1171.
  • 7GHONEIM IA, EL-GHONEIMY MN, EL-NAGGAR AE, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ure- teral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques[J]. Urology, 2010,75 (1) : 45-50.
  • 8HANDA RK, MCATEER JA, CONNORS BA, et al. Optimis- ing an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to pro- tect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy[J]. BJU Int,2012, 110(11) :1041-1047.
  • 9MISHRA S, SHARMA R, GARG C, et al. Prospective corn parative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to2 cmsize renal stone[J]. BJUInt,2011,108(6): 896 899.
  • 10HANDA RK, MATLAGA BR, CONNORS BA, et al. Acute effects of percutaneous tract dilation on renal function and struc- ture[J]. J Endourol,2006,20(12) : 1030-1040.

二级参考文献32

共引文献162

同被引文献316

引证文献47

二级引证文献324

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部