期刊文献+

数字化乳腺X线引导下导丝定位钙化及切除活检患者的影像学表现与病理的相关性 被引量:1

Digital mammography-guided percutaneous localization and surgical biopsy of microcalcification in breast:Correlation between radiological and pathological findings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析经数字化乳腺X线引导下导丝定位钙化切除活检证实的良恶性乳腺病变的X线征象,筛选有效客观影像学因子。方法收集接受数字化乳腺X线引导下导丝定位钙化切除活检的乳腺病变患者98例,分析并记录病变的X线征象[钙化类型、分布类型、分布范围、背景腺体密度、乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类],比较良恶性病变X线征象差异及BI-RADS 4类患者A、B、C亚类中良恶性病变构成比的差异。结果 98例中,良性病变72例(72/98,73.47%),恶性26例(26/98,26.53%)。良恶性病变的钙化类型、BI-RADS分类差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05);BIRADS类患者3三个亚类中,良恶性病变构成比差异有统计学意义(P=0.003),BI-RADS 4C中恶性病变比例最高(8/11,72.73%),BI-RADS 4A中良性病变比例最高(22/26,84.62%)。结论乳腺X线引导下导丝定位钙化切除活检术能够有效发现乳腺癌。钙化类型和BI-RADS分类是恶性乳腺钙化的有效影响因子。 Objective To analyze mammographic characteristics of benign and malignant lesions proved by surgical biopsy after digital mammography-guided percutaneous localization of microcalcification in breast, and to select effective objective factors. Methods Ninety-eight patients underwent preoperative digital mammography-guided percutaneous localization of microcalcification in breast and surgical biopsy. The image characteristics (type of calcification, type of calcification distribution, range of distribution, background density, breast imaging reporting and data system [BI-RADS]) were analyzed and recorded. Furthermore, image characteristics and components of benign and malignant lesions in BI-RADS 4A, 4B and 4C were compared. Results Benign and malignant lesions were detected in 72 (72/98, 73.47%) and 26 (26/98, 26.53%) patients, respectively. Type of calcification and BI-RADS grading were significantly different between benign and malignant lesions (all P〈0.05). The components of benign and malignant lesions among 3 subgrades of BI-RADS 4 were significantly different (P=0. 003), the most proportion of malignant lesions (8/11, 72.73%) was found in BI-RADS 4C, of benign ones (22/26, 84.62%) was found in BI-RADS 4A. Conclusion Digital mammography guided pereutaneous localization and surgical biopsy of microcalcification in breast could effectively detect breast cancer. The type of calcification and BIRADS grading are effective factors of differentiating malignant breast calcifications from benign ones.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期724-727,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(81371715) 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB707705) 首都特色临床应用研究(Z121107001012115)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 乳房X线摄影术 微钙化 Breast neoplasms Mammography Microcalcification
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Dorsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-mammography. 4th ed. VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
  • 2彭庆蓥,胡大章.全数字化乳腺X线引导下钙化灶导丝定位活检对早期乳腺癌诊断的意义[J].肿瘤基础与临床,2012,25(1):63-64. 被引量:21
  • 3Fondrinier E, Lorimier G, Guerin-Boblet V, et al. Breast micro- calcifications: Multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical fac-tors for carcinoma. World J Surg, 2002,26(3) :290-296.
  • 4Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, et al. The breast ima- ging reporting and data system: Positive predictive value of mam- mographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1998,171(1) :35-40.
  • 5Burnside ES, Ochsnet JE, Fowler KJ, et al. Use of microcalcifi- cation descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malig nancy. Radiology, 2007,242(2):388-395.
  • 6Kettritz U, Morack G, Decker T. Stereotactic vacuurn assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: Radiologi- cal and pathological correlations. Eur J Radiol, 2005,55(2) : 270- 276.
  • 7Michel SC, L6w R, Singer G, et al. Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: Routine clinical experience and correlation with BI- RADS--classification and histopathology. Praxis (Bern 1994), 2007,96(39) : 1459-1474.
  • 8Rominger M, Wisgickl C, Timmesfeld N. Breast microcalcifica- tions as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: A system- atic review and meta-analysis of 10 665 cases with special focus on round/punctate microcalcifications. Rofo, 2012, 184 (12): 1144- 1152.
  • 9Bent CK, Bassett LW, D'orsi CJ, et al. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assess- ment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194 (5) : 1878- 1383.
  • 10任阿红,张晓鹏,李洁,孙应实,唐磊,曹崑,欧阳涛,王天峰,陆爱萍.数字化乳腺X线摄影检出BI-RADS 3~5级微钙化病变的动态增强MR研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2009(1):89-92. 被引量:10

二级参考文献19

  • 1Kneeshaw PJ, Lowry M, Manton D, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast, 2006,15(1) :29-38.
  • 2Fondrinier E, Lorimier G, Guerin-Boblet V, et al, Breast microcalcifications: multivariate analysis of radiologic and clinical factors for carcinoma. World J Surg, 2002,26(3) : 290-296.
  • 3Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J, 2005, 11 (6) : 382- 390.
  • 4American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4 th ed. American College of Radiology, Reston
  • 5American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Breast Microcalcifications. Available at http://www, acr. org/s_ acr/bin, asp? TracklD = &SID = 1&DID = 11867&C1D = 12OO&-VID= 2&DOC = File. PDF. Accessed May, 2, 2007. 2003.
  • 6Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ, et al. Use of microcaleification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology, 2007,242(2):388-395.
  • 7Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2007, 103(3) :269-281.
  • 8Nakahara H, Namba K, Fukami A, et al. Three-dimensional MR imaging of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications. Breast Cancer, 2001,8(2) :116-124.
  • 9Trecate G, Tess JD, Vergnaghi D, et al. Breast microcalcifications studied with 3D contrast enhanced high-field magnetic resonance imaging: more accuracy in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Tumori, 2002,88(3) :224 -233.
  • 10Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, et al. Evaluation of breast imaging reporting and data system category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotaeic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practic. Cancer, 2004, 100 (4): 710- 714.

共引文献29

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部