期刊文献+

75岁以上老人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后短期疗效的性别差异 被引量:2

Gender difference in short-term outcome of over-75-year-old patient after percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究≥75岁的冠心病患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后住院期间的疗效是否有性别差异。方法从2005年1月到2010年12月502名接受了PCI术的≥75岁老年患者入选本研究,其中36.5%为女性,63.5%为男性。对不同性别患者临床特点和住院期间的疗效进行了比较。结果502名患者年龄为(78.5±3.2)岁,平均住院日(23.2±6.5)d。男性与女性相比,ST段抬高型心肌梗死的发病率高,而心力衰竭的发病率低。男性与女性住院期间的手术成功率(94.3%vs 94.5%, P=1.000)和死亡率(1.3%vs 3.5%,P=0.093)差异没有统计学意义。结论在≥75岁的老年冠心病患者中行PCI手术具有高成功率和可接受的死亡率。尽管男性的基础临床情况更差一些,但在接受PCI术的老年患者中,住院期间的结果没有性别差异。 Objective To investigate whether there exists difference in in-hospital outcomes between male and female elderly patients with coronary artery diseases after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods In a single center, a total of 502 consecutive patients (aged ≥75 years, 36.5% women and 63.5% men) who underwent PCI from January 2005 to December 2010 were recruited in this cohort study. Clinical features and in-hospital outcomes were compared between males and females. Results The age of the 502 patients was (78.5±3.2) years. The in-hospital length was (23.2±6.5)d. The male patients presented higher prevalence of ST elevation myocardial infarction but lower incidence of heart failure than the female ones. There was no significant difference in the successful rate of in-hospital procedures (94.3% vs 94.5%, P=1.000) and in mortality (1.3% vs 3.3%, P=0.093) between the male and female patients. Conclusion For the patients over 75 years old with coronary artery diseases, PCI is a good choice with higher successful rate and acceptable mortality. Although males have worse baseline conditions, there is no difference in in-hospital outcome between males and females after PCI.
出处 《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》 2014年第4期263-267,共5页 Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
关键词 性别因素 冠状动脉疾病 预后 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 sex factors coronary artery disease prognosis percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Grüntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE.Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis:percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty[J]. NEngl J Med, 1979, 301(2): 61-68.
  • 2Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heartdisease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a reportfrom the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation,2011, 123(4): e18-e209.
  • 3Kelsey SF, James M, Holubkov AL, et al. Results ofpercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty inwomen. 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and BloodInstitute’s Coronary Angioplasty Registry[J].Circulation, 1993, 87(3): 720-727.
  • 4Cowley MJ, Mullin SM, Kelsey SF, et al. Sexdifferences in early and long-term results of coronaryangioplasty in the NHLBI PTCA Registry[J].Circulation, 1985, 71(1): 90-97.
  • 5Jacobs AK, Johnston JM, Haviland A, et al. Improvedoutcomes for women undergoing contemporarypercutaneous coronary intervention: a report from theNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamicregistry[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, 39(10):1608-1614.
  • 6King KM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, et al. Sex differencesin outcomes after cardiac catheterization: effectmodification by treatment strategy and time[J]. JAMA,2004, 291(10): 1220-1225.
  • 7Mock MB, Holmes DR Jr, Vlietstra RE, et al.Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty(PTCA) in the elderly patient: experience in theNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PTCARegistry[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1984, 53(12): 89C-91C.
  • 8Kelsey SF, Miller DP, Holubkov R, et al. Results ofpercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty inpatients greater than or equal to 65 years of age (fromthe 1985 to 1986 National Heart, Lung, and BloodInstitute’s Coronary Angioplasty Registry)[J]. Am JCardiol, 1990, 66(15): 1033-1038.
  • 9Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, et al. Guidelines forpercutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Areport of the American College ofCardiology/American Heart Association Task Force onAssessment of Diagnostic and TherapeuticCardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee onPercutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty)[J].Circulation, 1988, 78(2): 486-502.
  • 10Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al.ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update forPercutaneous Coronary Intervention—summary article:a report of the American College ofCardiology/American Heart Association Task Force onPractice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI WritingCommittee to Update the 2001 Guidelines forPercutaneous Coronary Intervention)[J]. Circulation,2006, 113(1): 156-175.

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部