期刊文献+

运用PET评估非症状性颈动脉狭窄支架植入前后脑葡萄糖代谢变化 被引量:2

Changes of cerebral glucose metabolism assessed by positron emission tomography before and after carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic carotid stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨非症状性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉支架植入前后脑葡萄糖代谢率的变化.方法 依据相关标准,在南京卒中注册系统中筛选出自2010年3月至12月连续登记的11例接受颈动脉支架植入术的非症状性颈动脉狭窄患者.所有患者术前及术后3个月分别进行PET-CT检查(18F-FDG示踪),采用感兴趣区法记录各动脉供血区脑葡萄糖的标准摄取最大值,并应用统计学方法比较术前术后患侧颈动脉区域脑代谢值及与对侧比较. 结果 术前患侧颈动脉区域脑葡萄糖标准摄取最大值平均值为(4.99±0.96),明显低于对侧(5.67±1.27),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).随访时患侧颈动脉区域脑葡萄糖标准摄取最大值平均值为(5.83±l10),较术前明显提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但与术后对侧(5.85±1.08)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05). 结论 非症状性颈动脉狭窄患侧脑葡萄糖代谢率显著降低,而行颈动脉支架植入术能明显改善患侧脑葡萄糖代谢率. Objective To evaluate the changes of cerebral glucose metabolism before and after carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.Methods Eleven patients,admitted to and performed CAS in our hospital from March 2010 to December 2010,were enrolled.The patients received PET-CT examination before and 3 months after CAS (tracking by 18F-FDG).The max standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of each artery supplement area was recorded by region of interest (ROI) method.The metabolism of affected carotid artery area was compared before and after CAS,and the affected carotid area and the unaffected one.Results The SUVmax before CAS in the affected carotid area (4.99±0.96) was significantly lower than that of the unaffected one (5.67±1.27,P〈0.05); follow-up SUVmax in the affected carotid area (5.83 ±1.10) was significantly increased as compared with that before CAS (P〈0.05); follow-up SUVmax in the affected carotid area showed no significant difference as compared with that in the unaffected one after CAS (5.85±1.08,P〉0.05).Conclusion The cerebral glucose metabolism of the affected carotid area decreases significantly,which could be improved after CAS.
出处 《中华神经医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期512-517,共6页 Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
基金 江苏省博士后基金(7131702011)
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 支架植入术 葡萄糖 标准摄取最大值 Carotid artery Stenosis Glucose Standardized uptake value
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Goldstein LB,Bushnell CD,Adams RJ,et al.Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke:a guideline for healthcare professionals fiom the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J].Stroke,2011,42(2):517-584.
  • 2Brott TG,Halperin JL,Abbara S,et al.2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAFS I R/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease:executive summary.A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines,and the American Stroke Association,American Association of Neuroscience Nurses,American Association of Neurological Surgeons,American College of Radiology,American Society of Neuroradiology,Congress of Neurological Surgeons,Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention,Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,Society of Interventional Radiology,Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery,Society for Vascular Medicine,and Society for Vascular Surgery[J].Circulation,2011,124(4):489-532.
  • 3Brott TG,Hobson RW 2nd,Howard G,et al.Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis[J].N Engl J Med,2010,363(1):11-23.
  • 4North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis[J].N Engl J Med,1991,325(7):445-453.
  • 5Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study[J].JAMA,1995,273(18):1421-1428.
  • 6Halliday A,Mansfield A,Marro J,et al.Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms:randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2004,363(9420):1491-1502.
  • 7European Stroke Initiative Executive Committee,EUSI Writing Committee,Olsen TS,et al.European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management-update 2003[J].Cerebrovasc Dis,2003,16(4):311-337.
  • 8Naylor AR.Time to rethink management strategies in asymptomatic carotid artery disease[J].Nat Rev Cardiol,2012,9(2):116-124.
  • 9Derdeyn CP.Mechanisms of ischemic stroke secondary to large artery atherosclerotic disease[J].Neuroimaging Clin N Am,2007,17(3):303-311.
  • 10Sfyroeras GS,Karkos CD,Gerassimidis TS.Cerebral perfusion patterns in patients with extracranial carotid atherosclerosis and the impact of carotid stenting.A review[J].J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino),2008,49(4):497-502.

同被引文献18

  • 1杨玉杰,李敬府,白志勇,贾建文,王金锐.应用彩色多普勒超声对手术治疗颈动脉狭窄效果的评价[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(5):361-363. 被引量:7
  • 2Johnston SC, Mendis S, Mathers CD. Global variation in stroke burden and mortality: estimates from monitoring, surveillance, and modeling [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2009, 8 (4): 345-354.
  • 3Kenji K, Larry A. The feature selection problem: Traditional methods and a new algorithm[C]. Cambridge: AAAI Press, 1992: 129-134.
  • 4Igor K. Estimating attributes: Analysis and extensions of RELIEF [C]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1994, 784: 171-182.
  • 5刘杰,杜军平.基于ReliefF特征加权支持向量机的语义图像分类[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,42(s1):750-754.
  • 6Jia Q, Liu L, Wang Y. Risk factors and prevention of stroke in the Chinese population [J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2011, 20(5): 395-400.
  • 7Kosowski M, Zimoch W, Gwizdek T, et al. Safety and efficacy assessment of carotid artery stenting in a high-risk population in a single-centre registry[J]. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej, 2014, 10 (4): 258-263.
  • 8Jia JH, Yang N, Zhang C, et al. Object-oriented feature selection of high spatial resolution images using an improved Relief algorithm [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2013, 58 (s3-4): 619-626.
  • 9范文兵,王全全,雷天友,朱辉.基于Q-relief的图像特征选择算法[J].计算机应用,2011,31(3):724-728. 被引量:8
  • 10项广宇,翟鲁辉,席晓.支架植入血管成形术治疗老年人颈动脉狭窄32例[J].中国老年学杂志,2012,32(20):4505-4506. 被引量:9

引证文献2

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部