期刊文献+

时间变量信息框架对护士和患者风险决策行为的影响

Influence of time variable information framing on risk decision-making behaviors of nurses and patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨时间变量信息框架对护士和患者风险决策行为的影响。方法采用6种时间变量信息框架问卷对西安市3所三级甲等医院的474名在职护士和627例患者进行分层抽样调查。结果①"累计生存时间""区间生存时间"框架下,护士和患者决策均出现"框架效应"现象,即呈现正面信息时保守、负面信息时冒险。前者正面信息刺激下护士和患者支持手术的人数比例为50.63%、48.15%;负面为68.35%、69.44%。后者正面信息下护士和患者支持手术为40.24%、50.51%;负面为76.25%、69.81%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05)。②"平均预期寿命"框架下,护士和患者决策均未出现"框架效应"现象。③"时间变量"信息框架下护士与患者风险决策比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 "平均预期寿命"的表述方式能够规避正面或负面不同表述角度的影响,是值得推荐的医疗决策信息表述方式。 Objective To explore the influence of different time variable information framing on risky decision - making behaviors of nurses and patients. Methods A stratified sampling investigation was conducted among 474 nurses and 627 patients from three 3A - level hospitals in Xi'an using the questionnaire of different time variable information framing. Results ①Under the frames of " cumulative probability" and " interval probability" , both nurses and patients showed "framing effect" ,in other words, participates preferred conservative treatment when they received positive information, while they showed more risky when receiving negative information. In the frame of " cumulative probability" , the proportion supporting a surgery of nurses and patients in positive framing was 50.63% and 48.15% , which were 68.35% and 69.44% in negative framing;While in the frame of "interval probability", the proportion supporting a surgery of nurses and patients in positive framing was 40.24% and 50.51% ,which were 76.25% and 69.81% in negative framing,the differences were statistically significant (P 〈0.01 or P 〈0.05 ).②Under the frame of " average life expectancy" ,both nurses and patients showed no "framing effect". ③There existed no differences in risk decision - making between nurses and patients under different time variable information framing ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The expression of " average life expectancy" can avoid the influences of both expressions of positive or negative information format, and it is a recommendable expression of medical decision - making information.
出处 《护理管理杂志》 2014年第5期311-313,共3页 Journal of Nursing Administration
基金 陕西省攻关课题(2013K12-19-01)
关键词 时间变量 风险决策 医疗决策 框架效应 time variable risk decision -making medical decision -making framing effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Peters E, Hart PS, Fraenkel L. Informing patients : The influence of nu- meracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk percep- tions[ J]. Med Deci Mak,2011,31 (3) :432 - 436.
  • 2Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice[ J]. Sci,1981,211 (4481) :453 -458.
  • 3黎贵,李峥,薛岚,张淑香.癌症患者身心健康状况与其临床决策倾向性的相关性[J].护理管理杂志,2010,10(6):391-393. 被引量:5
  • 4郁晓路,袁长蓉,仇瑶琴,沈园园,陈晓英.护理伦理决策能力的评价方法及启示[J].护理管理杂志,2013,13(7):494-496. 被引量:5
  • 5Perneger TV, Agoritsas T. Doctors and patients'susceptibility to framing bias: A randomized Trim [ J ]. J Gen Intern Med, 2011,26 ( 12 ) : 1411 - 1417.
  • 6Shepherd HL,Butow PN ,Tattersall MH. Factors which motivate cancer doctors to involve their patients in reaching treatment decisions [ J ]. Patient Educ and Courts,2011,84 (2) :229 - 235.
  • 7Almashat S, Ayotte B, Edelstein B, et al. Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making [ J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2008,71 ( 1 ) : 102 - 107.
  • 8Choi H, Wong JB, Mendiratta A, et al. Numeraey and framing bias in epilepsy[ J]. Epilepsy Behav,2011,20( 1 ) :29 - 33.
  • 9Arkes HR. Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways tominimize their impact [ J]. Consult Clirt Psyehol, 1981, 49(3) :323 -330.
  • 10Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, et al. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography[ J]. Ann Intern Med, 1997,127 ( 11 ) :966 - 972.

二级参考文献35

  • 1李春玉,金锦珍,崔仁善.35所高等护理院校护理伦理学教学现状的调查分析[J].中国护理管理,2006,6(2):12-13. 被引量:33
  • 2Nolan MT,Hughes M,Narendra DP,et al. When patients lack capacity:The roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions [ J ]. Cancer Pain Relief Committee,2005,30 (4) : 342 - 353.
  • 3Davidson JR,Brundage MD, Feldman - Stewart D. Lung cancer treat- ment decisions : Patients' desires for participation and information [ J ]. Psychooncology, 1999,8 ( 6 ) :511 - 520.
  • 4Sainio C, Lauri S, Eriksson E. Cancer patients' views and experiences of participation in care and decision making [ J ]. Nursing Ethics, 2001,8(2) :97 - 113.
  • 5马丽莉.癌症患者参与治疗护理决策现状及影响因素的研究[D].北京:中国协和医科大学论文集,2004.
  • 6Stewart DE,Wong F, Cheung AM,et al. Information needs and deci- sional preferences among women with ovarian cancer[ J ]. Gynecologic Oncology ,2000,77 ( 3 ) :357 - 361.
  • 7Essink - Bot ML, Stouthard MEA. Generalizability of valuations on health states collected with the Euro QOL- Questionnaire[ J]. Health Economics, 1993,2 ( 3 ) :237 - 246.
  • 8Lacovides A, Fountoulakis KN, Kaprinis S, et al. The relationship between job stress,burnout and clinical depression[ J]. Journal of Affectire Disorders,2003,75 ( 3 ) :209 - 221.
  • 9张梅.护生临床实习伦理道德培养状况调查[D].青岛:青岛大学,2009:28-29.
  • 10Bartels DM. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making [ J ]. Cognition, 2008, 108 ( 2 ) : 381 -417.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部