期刊文献+

欧元区与美国之间的经济波动比较——基于开放RBC模型的分析

Comparative Analysis of the Euro Area and The U. S. Economic Fluctuations: Based upon Open RBC Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 欧元区和美国同为世界最大的发达经济体,但经济波动却存在差异。1970—1994年欧元区经济波动率小于美国,特别是投资的波动率只有美国的1/2;1995—2013年它们之间的经济波动差异缩小,同时协动性增强。本文构建的包含趋势性和暂时性冲击的开放RBC模型表明,趋势性冲击对于欧元区经济波动的重要性更大,暂时性冲击则主导了美国的经济波动,尽管欧元区的两类冲击的随机扰动都小于美国。脉冲响应分析表明,趋势性冲击和暂时性冲击所分别对应的持久性和暂时性收入改变,是这两大经济体的净出口呈现逆周期性的重要原因。 The United States and the euro area are the world's largest developed economies with significant dif- ferences in economic fluctuations. In 1970 - 1994 business volatility of the euro area is less than that of United States, and particularly the euro area's investment volatility is only half the U. S. 's. However, the differ- ences of economic fluctuations between two economies in 1995- 2013 shrink, while the co- movement among the two has enhanced. The article constructs a RBC model including trends and temporary shocks. The model's estimations show the trend shock plays a larger role in explaining the euro area's business fluctuations; while the temporary shock dominate the US's economic fluctuations. And the two types of disturbance in the euro area are smaller than those in US. The model does well in replicating the business fluctuation of two economies. Im- pulse response analysis shows that the trend shock and temporary shock correspond to the permanent and transi- tory income change separately, which cause the coutercyclicality of net exports in two economies.
作者 邓翔 祝梓翔
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期63-74,共12页 Finance & Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目:"中国物价调整和变动的微观证据与特征分析(编号:71173149)"
关键词 经济波动 趋势性冲击 真实经济周期模型 脉冲响应 Economic Fluctuations Trend Shocks Real Business Cycle Model Impulse Response
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Philip R. Lane. The Eurom Sovereign Debt Crisis [ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2012, 26 (3): 69 - 101.
  • 2Frank Smets and Raf Wonters. An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area [J]. Journal of the Eurepean Ecanomic Association, 2003, 1 (5): 1123-1175.
  • 3Peter N. Ireland. Stochastic Growth in the United States and Eure Area [ J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2013, 11 (1): 1-24.
  • 4Aguiar, Mark and Gita Gopinath. Emerging Market Business Cycles: The Cycle is Trend [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2007, 115 (1): 69-101.
  • 5Schmitt- Grehe, Stephanie and Martin Uribe. Closing Small Open Economy Models [J]. Journal of International Economics, 2003, (61): 163-185.
  • 6Javier Garcia- Cicco, Roberto Pancrazi, and Martin Uribe. Real Business Cycles in Emerging Countries? [J]. American Economic Review, 2010, 100 (5) : 2510 - 2531.
  • 7Neumeyer, Pablo A. and Fabrizio Peril. Business Cycles in Emerging Economies: the Role of Interest Rates [J]. Journal of Monetary Econnics, 2005 (52): 345-380.
  • 8Burnside, Craig. Real Business Cycle Models: Linear Approximation and GMM Estimation, manuscript [J]. The World Bank, 1999 (5).
  • 9Uhlig, H. A Toolkit for Analyzing Nonlinear Dynamic Stochastic Models Easily [C]. in Marim on, R., and A. Scott ( eds. ), Computational Methods for the Study of Dynamic Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 30-61.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部