期刊文献+

大数据:电子数据证据的挑战与机遇 被引量:35

Big Data: Challenges and Opportunities on the E-evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在大数据时代,挑战与机遇并存。从海量电子数据中去寻找那一丝与诉讼相关联的证据犹如海中捞针,使电子数据证据收集的成本增加,电子数据证据偏在成为难以解决的结构性问题。更为重要的是大数据的核心价值及数据挖掘方法对人们思维方式的改变,对电子数据证据的收集与司法应用产生了一定的影响。大数据时代催生了新的电子数据证据的采集方法,大数据挖掘技术也给电子数据证据的发现提供了新思路。在大数据时代最需要做的是努力使电子数据证据收集模式借助于大数据处理技术发挥更大的作用。应对大数据的挑战,把握大数据创造的机遇,完善电子数据证据收集的权利与义务以及对应用新技术收集电子数据证据给予相应的证明力,才能有效保障当事人公平地接近证据,维持当事人在诉讼上公平公正竞争,以促进诉讼及发现真实。 In the era of big data, it seems like seeking for a needle in a haystack to find a tiny evidence associated with proceedings from the mass of electronic data, and the complexity of data is also a challenge to the quality of E-evidence, as not only increases the cost of collecting E-evidence, but also makes the imbalance of E-evidence a difficult structural problems to solve. The era of big data has spawned new methods of collecting E-evidence, and the mining technology of big data also provides new ideas to the discovery of E-evidence. In the era of big data, it is thus necessary for us to make the collection mode of evidence play a bigger role by using big data processing technology. Confronting the effects of big data, we should improve the rights and obligations of collecting E-evidence, give corresponding weight to the collection of E-evidence by using new technologies, which can effectively protect the parties equitably access to evidence, maintain equitable competition, and promote litigation and the discovery of authenticity in the civil proceedings.
作者 高波
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期111-119,共9页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 大数据 电子数据证据 挑战 机遇 big data E-evidence challenges opportunities
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

  • 1汤维建.美国民事司法制度与民事诉讼[M].中国法制出版社,2000.
  • 2Jack H. Friedenthal Mary Kay Kane Arthur R. Miller: Civil Procedure, West publishing co. 1993. p379.
  • 3史蒂文·苏本玛格瑞特·伍.美国民事诉讼的真谛[M].蔡彦敏译.北京:法律出版社,2002.128.
  • 4Rosco Pound, The Cause of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice, 29 Report of the Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association395 (1906).
  • 5Jack H. Friedenthal Mary Kay Kane Arthur R. Miller:Civil Procedure, West publishing co. 1993. p407-409.
  • 6陈朴生.比较刑事证据法各论[M].台北:汉林出版社,1984.1-43.
  • 7转引自雷万来.民事证据法论[M].台北:瑞兴图书有限公司,1997.63.
  • 8林望民.间接反证[J].法学丛刊,:187-187.

共引文献143

引证文献35

二级引证文献211

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部