期刊文献+

上海典型停车换乘选择行为研究 被引量:13

Typical Choice Behavior of Park and Ride in Shanghai
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对上海6处停车换乘(P+R)点位使用率有高有低的情况,展开P+R用户选择行为调查。初步调查发现出行时间是最重要的影响因素,其次是出行费用。为研究结论普适性,采用网络观测辅以实际行程时间调查的方法,对高峰时段6个换乘点位的典型通勤路径的自驾、P+R方式的出行成本进行了调查。分析发现,上海P+R设施应分为城区内和城郊设施2种类型;P+R用户并非全部由自驾出行人员转换而来,也转自于公交+地铁或出租+地铁等其他出行方式人员;其中,自驾出行人员对时间节省最关注,道路通畅时其时间价值要低于交通拥堵时;公共交通出行人员由于出行时间节省而选择P+R;出租+地铁及普通停车换乘用户更关注出行费用;P+R有助于促进多模式交通出行,公交配套不完善地区P+R需求更大。 The paper conducts an investigation of the typical choice behavior for the unbalanced operation of Park and Ride in Shanghai .According to the results of the preliminary investigation ,travel time is the most important impact factor and the second most important impact factor is the travel cost .In order to verify the universality of the conclusion , this paper investigated the travel costs of typical travel routes at the peak time by network observation supplemented by actual travel time data .The study finds that :(1) P+R facilities in Shanghai can be divided into urban and suburban lots , and many users are derived from the public transportation and other motorized travel modes ;(2) drivers value travel time the most ,whose time value is higher in traffic jams than in free-flow road conditions ;(3) public transportation passen-gers are abstracted by the travel time savings while taxi users tempted by the travel cost ;(4) P+ R can promote multi-model travel mode ,and residents with imperfect bus transit services have higher demand for P+R facilities .
出处 《交通信息与安全》 2014年第2期11-16,共6页 Journal of Transport Information and Safety
基金 上海市科委重点项目(批准号:11511501100) 上海市浦江人才计划项目(批准号:11PJD022) 长江学者和创新团队发展计划项目(批准号:IRT1277)资助
关键词 城市交通 停车换乘 选择行为 行为(RP)调查 典型通勤路径 urban traffic Park and Ride choice behavior revealed preference survey typical commuting trip
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Meek S, Ison S, Enoch M, Role of bus based park and ride in the UK..a temporal and evaluative re view[J]. Transport Reviews. 2008,28 (6) : 781-803.
  • 2Seik F T. Experiences from Singapore's park and- ride scheme (1975-1996) [J]. Habitat International. 1997,21(4) 427-443.
  • 3Young Jong Kwon, Young In Kwon. Elements for the effective use o{ park and-ride facilities in the se- oul metropolitan areas, Korea[C]//TRB Annual Meeting, Washington DC : 2001.
  • 4Eurotest. ParkRide state of the art in Europe[DB/ OL]. (2009 05-10) [2013-06-19]. http://imagenes. racc. es/pub/ficheros/adjuntos/adjuntos eurotest_ parkride in europe jzq_97f05e27, pd{,2009.
  • 5潘驰,赵胜川.基于Logit模型的大连市居民通勤出行行为研究[J].交通信息与安全,2012,30(3):25-28. 被引量:16
  • 6Katherine F. Turnbull, Richard H. Pratt. TCRP Re- port 95. Ch. 3. Park-and ride/pool[R]. Washington D. C: Federal Transit Administration in Cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation, 2004.
  • 7Parkhurst Graham, Gordon Stokes. Park and ride in Oxford and York: report of surveys[R]. London: Economic Social Research Council, 1994.
  • 8Foote P J. Chicago transit authority weekday park and-ride users:Choice market with ridership growth potential[J]. Transportation Research Record. 2000 (1735) : 158-168.
  • 9张戎,闫哲彬,王林平.上海停车换乘选择比例研究[C] //杨涛.第十六届海峡两岸都市交通学术研讨会论文集.南京:东南大学出版社,2008:479-485.
  • 10熊萍.大型活动异地小汽车出行者的停车换乘行为[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(5):188-193. 被引量:3

二级参考文献29

  • 1秦焕美,关宏志,李洋.大城市P&R系统选择行为调查初步分析——以北京市为例[J].交通运输工程与信息学报,2004,2(4):77-83. 被引量:20
  • 2裴玉龙,刘春晓.停车换乘站位置选择及换乘需求预测[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2005,25(1):60-63. 被引量:17
  • 3陈刚,周扬军,程建学.城市外围停车换乘(P+R)设施换乘效率的评价分析方法[J].交通与运输,2005,21(B07):10-13. 被引量:4
  • 4杨飞.停车换乘实施效果分析--以英国牛津和约克为例.交通与运输,2005,(12):75-78.
  • 5Verhoef E T, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P. The economics of regulatory parking policies: The possibilities of parking policies in traffic regulation [ J ]. Transportation Research Part A, 1995, 29(2) : 141 - 156.
  • 6LamW H K, Nicholas M H, Lo H P. How park and ride schemes can be successful in Eastern Asia [ J ]. Journal of Urban Planning and Developing, ASCE, 2001, 127(2) : 63 -78.
  • 7Huang H J. Pricing and logit-based mode choice models of a transit and highway system with elastic demand[ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 140 (3) :562 -570.
  • 8Johnson E J, Meyer R J. Compensatory choice models of noncompensatory processes: the effect of varying the context[ J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1984, 11(1) : 528 -541.
  • 9刘竑治.大城市基于轨道交通的停车换乘系统研究【D】.长沙:长沙理工大学.2009.
  • 10Rosario Macario. Lies Goller. Methodology for the calculation of vehicle associated costs in urban areas[M]. Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century, 1999: 198-199.

共引文献38

同被引文献73

引证文献13

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部