对唐君毅谈朱陆异同源流之反思

Reflection on Tang Junyi's Discussion of the Similarities and Differences Between Zhu Xi and Lu Xiangshan

唐君毅对宋代儒学朱陆之争的解说别具深意,认为两者共出一源、同溯二程,只是在学圣成贤的工夫论上各现峥嵘;其实二贤之论始终相涵、博约相资,不论涵养、致知或省察,只要善会其意,善用其心,皆可使本心呈现、增扩存养;而如对朱陆的会通不以其道,则难免徒生门户之见、意气之争,如古今八百年来诸多学者的轻易之论。唐君毅意旨细腻,分解绵密,虽过多翻折推说,却实为正本清源之举,一扫前人之窠臼弊端。

Tang Junyi＇s insights of the dispute between Zhu Xi and Lu Xiangshan were that： both of them originated similarly from Cheng＇s two brothers and only had differentiations in self-cultivation theory on how to develop into a true saint; in fact,they were interrelated and interdependent; whatever ways they might choose to follow： control on oneself,study,or self-examination,one could make his conscience present and cultivate his virtue as long as one had carefully thought and understood; to link up both of them wrongly would easily bring about sectarian bias as like the opinions appeared in the history of more than eight hundred years. Tang Junyi＇s subtle ideas made order out of confusion.