期刊文献+

医疗服务提供方对按病种定额付费政策的认知现状——以四川省成都市为例 被引量:4

Study on the cognition status of implementing case-based payment policy among healthcare providers: A case in Chengdu,Sichuan Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解医疗服务提供方对按病种定额付费政策的认知现状,为进一步完善相关政策提供依据。方法:采用半结构式访谈方法,对9家医院38名工作人员和患者进行深入访谈。结果:各级医院积极执行按病种定额付费政策,并制定了相应的费用控制和管理措施,但各医院按病种定额结算的病例比例较低,在执行过程中存在着对病例纳入依据认识不一致、医疗服务提供方认为费用标准制定较为笼统等问题。结论:成都市按病种定额付费取得了一定成效,但也存在一些问题,需根据病种费用信息测算标准费用,完善按病种定额付费结算方式;进一步明确按病种定额付费病例的纳入依据和原则;逐步增加按病种定额付费疾病的种类;加强对医疗服务提供方的监管力度;引导医疗服务提供方建立有效的激励机制。 Objective : To understand the implementation status of case-based payment among healthcare provid- ers and their cognition on the matter. Methods : Semi-structured interview was conducted on 30 purposely selected staff from 9 hospitals in Chengdu. Results:After one-year implementation of case-based payment, hospitals at different level carried out the policy vigorously: executed corresponding expense control measures and management. Neverthe- less, the proportion of cases that were paid with case-based payment was low, moreover the inclusion criteria for case was of disunity and the formulation of the expense standard was ambiguous to some extent. Conclusion: Certain achievements were accompanied with problems, so it is essential to refine reimbursement standards, improve case- based payment, make clear the inclusion criteria for case and extend the covering range of case-based payment in Chengdu. In addition, the medical insurance agency should strengthen the supervision of healthcare providers, and guide them to set up effective incentive mechanism.
出处 《中国卫生政策研究》 CSCD 2014年第4期38-43,共6页 Chinese Journal of Health Policy
关键词 按病种定额付费 效果 评估 深入访谈 Case-based payment : Effect. Evaluation : In-depth interview
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献81

共引文献195

同被引文献34

  • 1胡苏云.公立医院补偿和运行机制分析:问题和对策[J].中国卫生经济,2006,25(7):11-13. 被引量:20
  • 2郭丽珍,苏芬,杨月霞.“以药养医”问题与渐进式的医药分业决策[J].海峡药学,2007,19(2):118-120. 被引量:5
  • 3国务院.关于印发《深化医药卫生体制改革2012年主要工作安排》的通知[EB/OL].(20120504)[2014-12-08].http://www.huaxiayifa.corn/news/?39457.html.
  • 4唐文熙,张亮.成本核算基础上的公立医院补偿方式改革研究:以某县级市人民医院实证为例[c]//清华大学经济管理学院医疗管理研究中心.2011清华医疗管理国际学术会议论文集,北京:清华大学出版社,2011:22-27.
  • 5Tummers L G, Van de Walle S. Explaining health care professionals' resistance to implement Diag- nosis Related Groups: (No) benefits for society, patients and professionals [J]. Health Policy,2012,108 (2-3): 158-166.
  • 6Hamada H, Sekimoto M, Imanaka Y. Effects of the per diem prospective payment system with DRG-likegrouping system (DPC/PDPS) on resource us- age and heahhcare quality in Japan [J]. Health Policy, 2012,(1):1-8.
  • 7Lee K, Lee S. Effects of the DRG-based prospec- tive payment system operated by the voluntarily partici- pating providers on the eesarean section rates in Korea[J]. Health Poliey,2007,81 (2-3):300-308.
  • 8Braun B, Klinke S, Muller R. Einfluss der DRGs auf Arbeitsbedingungen und Versorgungsqualitat yon Pflegekmften im Krankenhaus Ergebnisse einerbun- desweiten sehriftliehen Befragung reprasentativer Stieh- proben yon Pflegekraften an Akutkrankenhausern in den Jahren 2003, 2006 und 2008[J].artee-paper Nr,2011,(1): 173.
  • 9Zander B, Dobler L, Busse R. The introduction of DRG funding and hospital nurses' changing perceptions of their practice environment, quality of care and satis- faction: Comparison of cross-sectional surveys over a 10-year period[J]. International Journal of Nursing Stud- ies,2013,50(2):219-229.
  • 10Cheng S, Chen C, Tsai S. The impacts of DRG-based payments on health care provider behaviors under a univer- sal coverage system: A population-based study [J]. Health Policy,2012,107(2-3):202-208.

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部