恐怖主义犯罪应对模式研究

Mode of Terrorist Offenses Response

司法模式、战争模式、治理模式是三种应对恐怖主义犯罪的模式。司法模式把恐怖主义界定为一种犯罪行为。为此反恐是侦查破案与打击犯罪的问题。此模式核心是恢复法律的权威,维护社会治安秩序。战争模式把恐怖主义界定为一种战争行为。为此反恐是打败或消灭敌人、取得战争胜利的问题。此模式核心是打击、歼灭恐怖分子并取得战争胜利。治理模式把恐怖主义界定为国家安全治理方面的缺失、低效或失败及其导致的对民众安全服务的缺失与低效。为此反恐是加强和改善有关恐怖主义问题的治理,以提供更有效的安全服务。此模式核心是塑造一种安全环境。治理模式对于恐怖主义及反恐问题界定不同于战争模式、司法模式。这种界定具有决定性影响。其直接决定这三种反恐模式在视野、目标、思路、标准、力量、措施与手段、时间维度、战略角度、精神层面等方面的不同。

Models of justice, war mode, governance mode is the mode of the three deal with terrorism offenses. The justice model defines terrorism as a crime. This fight against terrorism is investigating this case and the fight against crime. The core of this mode is to restore the authority of the law, to maintain social order. War mode defines terrorism as an act of war. This fight against terrorism is to defeat or destroy the enemy, for the war effort. The core of this mode is to combat, to wipe out the terrorists and the war effort. Governance model defines terrorism as the lack of national security governance, inefficiency or failure and lead to the absence of the Civil Aid Service and inefficient. This fight against terrorism is to strengthen and improve governance on terrorism, in order to provide more effective security services. The core of this mode is to create a safe environment. Governance model is different from the mode of war, terrorism and counter-terrorism issues defined models of justice. This definition has a decisive impact on the direct decision of the three anti-terrorism mode in terms of vision, goals, ideas, standards, strength, measures and means different.