期刊文献+

替罗非班早期用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效与安全性 被引量:3

Clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban in the treatment of patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价替罗非班在急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的疗效及安全性。方法急诊收治的行PCI术患者87例,随机分为试验组41例和对照组46例,在常规抗凝治疗基础上,试验组于PCI术前早期静脉推注替罗非班10 mg·kg-1,然后以0.15μg·kg-1·min-1持续泵入至术后36 h;对照组只于PCI术前常规抗凝治疗。观察2组患者术后主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心肌酶指标及出血并发症。结果试验组MACE发生率为9.8%(4/41),显著低于对照组26.1%(12/46),差别有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组术后24 h心肌酶显著低于对照组(P<0.05);2组患者出血并发症差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论急诊PCI患者早期用替罗非班可显著降低MACE发生率,且不增加术后出血发生的风险。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tirofiban in the treatment of patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods Eighty- seven patients with acute coro- nary syndrome treated with PCI were recruited from Feb 2011 to Sep 2013 prospectively. They were randomly divided into treatment group (n =41 ) and control group (n =46). Based on the regular anticoagulant therapy, patients in the treatment group were given tirofiban 10 the early time of pre - PCI. And the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial enzymes and complication of the two groups were observed in the two groups. Results The rate of MACE (9. 8%, 4/41 ) in treatment group were much lower than that in the control group (26. 1%, 12/46) (P 〈 0. 05 ). The myocardial enzyme indicators of 24 hours after PCI was lower than that in the control group; but there was no difference in bleeding complications between the two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion MACE can be significantly decreased in patients who were treated with PCI by using tirofiban in the emergency department and tiro- fiban does not increase the risks to develop bleeding complications.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期397-398,413,共3页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
基金 天津市卫生局科技基金资助项目(2011KZ28)
关键词 替罗非班 经皮冠状动脉介入 心肌酶 tirofiban percutaneous coronary intervention myocardialenzyme
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Kung D, et al. Safety and efficacy of tirofi- ban in stent - assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms [J]. Neurosurgery, 2012,71:710 -714.
  • 2Valgimigli M, Tebaldi M. Safety evaluation of tirofiban [ J ]. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2010,9:801 - 819.
  • 3Valgimigli M, Tebaldi M, Campo G, et al. Prasugrel versus tirofiban bolus with or without short post - bolus infusion with or without con- comitant prasugrel administration in patients with myocardial infarc- tion undergoing coronary stenting: the FABOLUS PRO trial [ J ]. JACC Cardiovasc lnterv , 2012,5:268 -277.

同被引文献26

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部