期刊文献+

新生儿重症监护室临床危急值报告结果分析 被引量:5

Clinical analysis of critical value reporting system at a neonatal intensive care unit
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨新生儿重症监护室(NICU)危急值的特点及其对临床诊疗的启示。方法收集2012年7月至2012年11月重庆医科大学附属儿童医院新生儿科NICU危急值报告登记本上登记的所有信息完善的危急值病例。调查发生危急值患儿的孕周、出生体重,并分析各危急值项目比例、时间分布、临床应答情况等。结果本调查共有212例NICU患儿的369项危急值,其总体应答率为65.04%;NICU最常见危急值项目是影像学(81项,22.0%)、血糖(79项,21.4%)以及凝血功能(77项,20.9%);标本因素是假阳性危急值的主要原因之一。结论定期对NICU危急值临床资料进行总结,可以根据其特点对临床诊疗方案制定提供依据,并助于制定适合本单位的危急值标准,进而提高临床综合诊疗水平。 Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics of critical values in NICU and help to make the proper diagnosis and treatment plans of NICU.Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on all the critical values in NICU collected from July 1st,2012 to November 30th,2012 in Children′ s Hosptial of Chongqing Medical University. The gestional ages and birth weights of these babies,consitituent ratio of critical index,distribution of report time and clinicalresponse and the impact on treatment were analyzed.ResultsThere were 212 newborns with 369 items of time criticalvalues,and the rate of positive impact on management was 65.04%. Imaging tests(81 cases,22.0%),blood glucose(79cases,21.4%)and routine coagulation tests(77 cases,20.9%)were the most common critical values. Sample quality wasthe common cause of false positive critical values.ConclusionPeriodically analyzing and summarizing critical values data could help to make a more reasonable critical value system and improve clinical work efficiency andquality.
出处 《中国实用儿科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期363-366,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics
关键词 新生儿重症监护室 危急值 数据挖掘 重症监护 neonatal intensive care unit(NICU) critical value data mining critical care
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Piva E, Seiaeovelli L, Zaninotto M, et al. Evaluation of effec- tiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting criti- cal values [J ].Am J Clin Pathol, 2009, 131 (3) : 432-441.
  • 2Don-Wauchope AC, Wang L, Grey V. Pediatric critical val- ues: laboratory-pediatrician discourse [J].Clin Bioehem, 2009, 42(16-17) : 1658-1661.
  • 3Coffin CM, Spilker K, Lowiehik A, et al. Critical values in pe- diatric surgical pathology: definition, implementation, and re- porting in a children's hospital [J].Am J Clin Pathol, 2007,128(6): 1035-1040.
  • 4Yang D, Zhou Y, Yang C. Analysis oflaboratoryrepeateritical values at a large teiaryteaching hospital in China IJI.PLoS One, 2013, 8(3): e59518.
  • 5杨大干,郭希超,徐根云,张伟民,陈瑜.危急值项目的应用评估[J].中华检验医学杂志,2008,31(6):695-698. 被引量:35
  • 6兰海丽,张秀明,余元龙,杨有业,杨勇,韩志安,李钰燕,欧阳能良,解鸿翔.检验危急值应用的评估与持续改进[J].中华医院管理杂志,2009,25(4):235-238. 被引量:39
  • 7Kost GJ, Hale KN. Global trends in critical values practices and their harmonization [J].Clin Chem Lab Med, 2011, 49 (2) : 167-176.
  • 8Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study in 623 institutions [J].Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2002, 126(6): 663-669.
  • 9Aher S, Malwatkar K, Kadam S. Neonatal anemia [J]. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2008, 13(4) : 239-247.
  • 10Lundberg G. When to panic over an abnormal value [J].MLO Med Lab Obs, 1972,4:47-54.

二级参考文献16

  • 1李贵芳,王树辉,周湘红.临床检验危急值的建立与应用[J].检验医学与临床,2006,3(8):380-381. 被引量:38
  • 2张真路,刘泽金,赵耿生,杨军,王文武,崔敏.临床实验室危急值的建立与应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(4):452-453. 被引量:149
  • 3杨大干,周云仙.门诊病人检查的标本周转时间分析[J].中华医院管理杂志,2005,21(10):698-699. 被引量:13
  • 4葛荣跃,张伟民.设置检验科危急值和报告制度的重要性[J].江西医学检验,2007,25(1):55-56. 被引量:37
  • 5ISO. Medical laboratories-Particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189:2003.
  • 6Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a college of American Pathologists Q- Probes Study in 623 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2002, 126:663.669.
  • 7Dighe AS, Rao A, Coakley AB, et al. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol,2006 ,125 :758-764.
  • 8Howanitz PJ. Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patient safety. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2005,129: 1252- 1261.
  • 9Wagar EA, Tamashiro L, Yasin B, et al. Patient safety in the clinical laboratory: a longitudinal analysis of specimen identification errors. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2006, 130: 1662- 1668.
  • 10Barenfanger J, Sautter RL, Lang DL, et al. Improving patient safety by repeating (read-back) telephone reports of critical information. Am J Clin Pathol,2004 ,121:801-803.

共引文献66

同被引文献30

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部