期刊文献+

急诊经皮冠状动脉介入术联合血栓抽吸及替罗非班治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效观察 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗方法 (PCI)联合血栓抽吸及替罗非班在急性心肌梗死的临床治疗中的应用价值。方法选取2008-2013年来我院接受急性心肌梗死治疗的患者120例,按治疗方法不同依次分为观察组和对照组,比较两组患者的即刻治疗效果及出血并发症的发生情况和随访12个月心脏不良事件(mace)的发生率,复查造影TIMI血流。结果观察组患者的即刻和长期临床疗效明显优于对照组患者,P<0.05;观察组患者治疗过程中的出血发生率与对照组无明显差别,P>0.05。结论 PCI联合血栓抽吸及替罗非班治疗可有效提高急性心肌梗死即刻及长期治疗效果,且治疗过程中未出现明显其他不良反应,疗效安全、可靠,具有临床应用价值。
出处 《中国医学工程》 2014年第4期138-139,共2页 China Medical Engineering
基金 郴州市社会发展计划项目(2011NS035)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

共引文献61

同被引文献51

  • 1牛和平,张军,袁琛,付金国,费玲,万艳芳,王长厚.血栓抽吸在老年急性心肌梗死恢复期患者介入中的应用[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(12):3335-3337. 被引量:8
  • 2王东,曹中南.经皮冠状动脉介入联合替罗非班治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(4):874-875. 被引量:7
  • 3蔡舸,吕云,高彦.血栓抽吸联合替罗非班对老年急性心肌梗死择期经皮冠状动脉介入的运用价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(2):535-536. 被引量:6
  • 4Gennaro Sardella,Rocco Edoardo Stio.Thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction:Rationale and indication[J].World Journal of Cardiology,2014,6(9):924-928. 被引量:15
  • 5Wang HL, Xing SY, Dong PS, et al. Safety and efficacy of intracoronary tirofiban administration in patients with serious thrombus burden and ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. European review for medical and pharmacological sci- ences, 2014, 18(23):3690-3695.
  • 6Wang K, Zuo G, Zheng L, et al. Effects of tirofiban on platelet activa- tion and endothelial function in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J].Cell biochemistry and biophysics,2015, 71( 1 ): 135-142.
  • 7Tanguay JF, Bell AD, Ackman ML, et al .Focused 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the use of antiplatelet therapy[J].The Canadian journal of cardiology,2013,29( 11 ): 1334-1345.
  • 8Vlaar PJ, Svilaas T, van der Horst IC, et al. Cardiac death and reinfarc- tion after 1 year in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coro- nary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS): a l- year follow-up study[J]. Lancet (London, England), 2008, 371(9628):1915-1920.
  • 9Gu YL, Kampinga MA, Wieringa WG, et al. Intracoronary versus intra- venous administration of abciximab in patients with ST-segment eleva- tion myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration: the comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during emergency reperfu-sion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial[J]. Circulation, 2010, 122(25):2709-2717.
  • 10Akpek M, Sahin O, Sarli B, et al.Acute Effects of Intracoronary Tirofi- ban on No-Reflow Phenomena in Patients With ST-Segment Elevated Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary In- tervention[J]. Angiology, 2015,66(6):560-567.

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部