期刊文献+

论证研究中的论辩性维度 被引量:2

The Dialectical Consideration of the Study of Dialectic
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过分别对非形式逻辑理论、形式论辩术理论和语用论辩术理论中的论辩性维度进行分析,文章从整体上勾勒了当下论辩性研究的基本概貌与大致趋势,并由此揭示了将主体性因素纳入论证研究的几种可能进路。 Based on the analysis of theories of informal logic, formal dialectics and pragma - dialectics from the dialectical perspective, this paper attempts to figure out the general situations and the current trends of the study of dialectic, and further illustrates the possible approaches to embed the agency factor within the argumentation study accordingly.
作者 陈彦瑾
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期32-37,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 教育部哲学社会科学2010年度重大攻关项目(10JZD0006) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2010年度重大项目(10JJD720009) 国家社科基金2011年度青年项目(11CZX044)
关键词 论证 论辩性 对话 主张者 反对者 argumentation dialectic dialogue proponent opponent
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Krabbe E C W.Profiles of Dialogue as a Dialectical Tool [ C ]//Van Eemeren F H.Advances in Pragma-dialec-tics.Amsterdam:Sic Sat,2002:153-167.
  • 2Johnson R H.Manifest Rationality:a Pragmatic Theory of Argument [ M ].Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum,2000:168.
  • 3Barth E M,Krabbe E C W.From Axiom to Dialogue:a Phil-osophical Study of Logics and Argumentation [ M ].Berlin:de Gruyter,1982:87.
  • 4Van Eemeren F H,Grootendorst R,Snoeck Henkemans A F,et al.Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory:a Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments [ M ].Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1996.
  • 5Van Eemeren F H,Grootendorst R.Speech Acts in Argu-mentative Discussions:a Theoretical Model for Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion [ M ].Dordrecht:Foris,1984:9-15.
  • 6Van Eemeren F H.Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse:Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Ar-gumentation [ M ].Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company,2010:29.
  • 7Van Eemeren F H,Grootendorst R.Systematic Theory of Ar-gumentation:the Pragma-dialectical Approach [ M ].Cam-bridge:Cambridge University Press,2004:57-62.
  • 8Van Eemeren F H,Grootendorst R,Snoeck Henkemans A F.Argumentation:Analysis,Evaluation,Presentation [ M ].Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2002:82-183.
  • 9Wenzel J W.Toward a Normative Theory of Argumentation:Van Eemeren and Grootendorst' s Code of Conduct for Ra-tional Discussions [ C]//Cox J R,Sillars M O,Walker G B.Argumentation and Social Practice:Proceedings of the Fourth SCA./AFA Conference on Argumentation.Annandale:Speech Communication Association,1985:139-153.
  • 10Garver E.Comments on Rhetorical Analysis within a Prag-ma-dialectical Framework [ J ].Argumentation,2000,14:307.

二级参考文献44

  • 1任平,欧阳康,冯平,鞠实儿.当代哲学研究的前沿问题(续):马克思“反思的问题视域”及其当代意义[J].中国社会科学,2006(6):35-40. 被引量:57
  • 2Plato, Theaetetus, translated with notes by John McDowell, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
  • 3Witt~enstein, Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001, pp. 68, 43.
  • 4肖尔兹.《简明逻辑史》,张家龙、吴可译,北京:商务印书馆,1977年,第6-25页.
  • 5J. A. Mortimer, "Logic, " in Great Books of the Western World, Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1990, pp. 798-810.
  • 6Susan Haack, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996, pp. 26-35.
  • 7托马斯·许兰德·埃里克森.《小地方,大论题一--社会文化人类学导论》,董薇译,北京:商务印书馆,2008年,第10页.
  • 8舍尔巴次基.《佛教逻辑》,宋力道等译,北京:商务印书馆,1997年,第1-2、365-368页.
  • 9亚里士多德.《工具论》,余纪元译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003年.
  • 10Michael A Gilbert, Coalescent Argumentation, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.

共引文献97

同被引文献2

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部