红学史模式转型与建构的学术意义

The Academic Significance of the Transformation and Construction of the Models in Redological History

《红楼梦》研究大致经历了古典和近、现代以及当代红学这三个重要阶段,新时期以来的红学史专论,从类型上看,主要是以历史分期为本位、红学人物为本位、方法论为本位、国别红学为本位等,研究者从各自的视角总结了其视野所及之红学,但多少都出现了由材料和方法所带来的缺陷及阐释盲点,难以理清红学史的真正脉络。通过对红学史盲点的探索而发现新的学术增长点,进而从红学流派批评的新视角切入并结合文化渊源系统考察其源流,应该属于红学史的"推进型"研究,而这正符合学术史发展趋势。

The studies of the Dream of the Red Chamberroughly experience a classical period, a recent to modern period and a current period. Monographs in the new period about the history of redology can typologically be classified as those that focus on historical periodisation, those on the study of redological figures, those on methodologies, and those on redology in different countries, etc. Researchers in the past managed to summarise the studies of redology that they could cover from their perspectives. However, due to the limitation of their materials or their approaches, their studies cannot really avoid flaws and points they overlooked in their interpretations, and cannot really capture the history of the acceptance of Dream of the Red Chamber. Through an exploration of the blind spots in their studies and the discovery of new academic possibilities, this paper tends to study redology from the new perspective of school criticism and to systematically study the genealogy of redology from the perspective of cultural development. It is a study that is to propel the development of rcdology, a fact that is congruent with the development of academic history.