期刊文献+

绩效工资强度对高校教工薪酬满意度影响的实证研究 被引量:7

An Empirical Research of the Impact of Performance Pay Intensity on Salary Satisfaction of Higher Education Institutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以高校教工600份薪酬满意度调查问卷为样本,以SPSS19.0为工具,通过对样本数据进行二次曲线拟合分析、相关性分析等处理,验证了高校教工绩效工资强度与薪酬满意度之间存在倒U关系;设定岗位、职称、学历对二者的关系具有调节作用,通过分层多元回归分析对其进行了验证,并对其进行二次曲线估计,得出不同岗位、职称、学历的教工实现薪酬满意最大化时的绩效工资强度,为高校教工绩效工资的设定具有一定指导作用。 By taking 600 copies of questionnaire on salary satisfaction of teaching and administrative staff of higher education institutions as samples, applying SPSS19.0 as a tool and making quadratic curve fitting analysis and correlation analysis on the sample data, the paper proposes that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between performance pay intensity and salary satisfaction: setting up positions, professional titles and education qualifications have a moderate role on the relationship between performance pay intensity and salary satisfaction. It then applies hierarchical multiple regression analysis to verify the relationship and carries out quadratic curve estimation on it. The paper also draws that teaching and adminislrativc staff of different positions, professional titles and education qualifications achieve the performance pay intensity with the maximization of salary satisfaction. It provides guidelines for the higher education institutions to set up performance pay.
作者 袁宇 李福华
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2014年第6期172-176,共5页 East China Economic Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71073089) 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(09YJA880071)
关键词 绩效工资强度 薪酬满意度 前景理论 performance pay intensity salary satisfaction Prospect Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Schay B W. Impacts of Performance-contingent Pay on Em- ployee Attitudes [J]. Public Personnel Management, 1998,17 (2) :237-250.
  • 2Lazear E P. Performance pay and productivity [J]. American Economic Review, 2000,90(5) : 1346-1361.
  • 3Mcnabb R, Whitfield K. The Impact of Varying Types of Per- formance-related Pay and Employee Participation on Earnings [J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2007,18(6) : 1004-1025.
  • 4Green C, Heywood J S. Does Performance Pay Increase Job Satisfaction? [ J ]. Economica, 2008,75 (4) : 710-728.
  • 5Hubre V L, Seybolt P M, Venemon K. The Relationship be- tween Individual Inputs, Perceptions, and Multidimensional Pay Satisfaction[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1992,22(17) : 1356-1373.
  • 6Merriman K K, Deckop J R. Loss aversion and variable pay: A motivational perspective [J]. International Journal of Hu- man Resource Management, 2007,18 (6) : 1026-1 04 1.
  • 7Pokorny K. Pay-but do not pay too much: An experimental study on the impact of incentives[J]. Journal of Economic Be- havior &Organization, 2008,66 (2) : 251-264.
  • 8张建国.薪酬体系设计【M】.北京:北京工业大学出版社,2003.
  • 9林健,李焕荣.高校激励型整体薪酬模式的设计研究[J].中国高教研究,2004(8):41-43. 被引量:67
  • 10扬剑 白云 朱晓红.激励导向的薪酬设计[M].北京:中国纺织出版社,2002..

二级参考文献37

  • 1张黎莉,周耀烈.员工工作满意度研究综述[J].企业经济,2005,24(2):29-30. 被引量:77
  • 2汪彩玲.工作满意度影响因素分析[J].市场研究,2005(2):29-32. 被引量:21
  • 3LAZEAR E P.Performance Pay and Productivity[J].American Economic Review,2000,90(5):1 346-1 361.
  • 4SCHAY B W.Impacts of Performance-contingent Pay on Employee Attitudes[J].Public Personnel Management,1998,17(2):237-250.
  • 5MCNABB R,WHITFIELD K.The Impact of Varying Types of Performance-related Pay and Employee Participation on Earnings[J].International Journal of Human Resource Management,2007,18(6):1 004-1 025.
  • 6WERNER S,WARD S G.Recent Compensation Research:An Eclectic Review[J].Human Resource Management Review,2004,14(2):201-227.
  • 7KELLOUGH J E,NIGRO L G.Pay for Performance in Georgia State Government:Employee Perspectives on Georgia Gain after 5 Years[J].Review of Public Personnel Administration,2002,22(2):146-166.
  • 8MICELI M P,HENEMAN R L.Contextual Determinants of Variable Pay Plan Design:A Proposed Research Framework[J].Human Resource Management Review,2000,10(3):289-305.
  • 9DONALDSON S I,GRANT-VALLONE E J.Understanding Self-report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research[J].Journal of Business and Psychology,2002,17(2):245-259.
  • 10KUHN K M,YOCKEY M D.Variable Pay as a Risky Choice:Determinants of the Relative Attractiveness of Incentive Plans[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2003,90(2):323-341.

共引文献129

同被引文献81

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部