期刊文献+

飞秒激光制瓣与板层角膜刀制瓣LASIK术后视觉质量及眼内散射 被引量:6

Objective optical quality and intraocular scatter after LASIK: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨飞秒激光制瓣及板层角膜刀制瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后客观视觉质量及眼内散射.方法 回顾性研究.符合常规手术适应证,术前矫正视力≥5.0的近视患者72例(72眼).飞秒激光制瓣LASIK组(F-LASIK)35例(35眼),术前屈光度(-6.18±2.25)D;角膜刀制瓣LASIK组(M-LASIK)37例(37眼),术前屈光度(-6.62±1.78)D.术后1年应用客观视觉质量分析系统测量以下指标:调制传递函数截止频率(MTFcutoff),斯特列尔比以及眼内散射指数.2组间各参数比较应用独立极样t检验或Wilcoxon秩和检验.结果 2组术后均无最佳矫正视力丢失.安全指数F-LASIK组为1.06±0.12,M-LASIK组为1.05±0.14,2组差异无统计学意义(t=0.382,P>0.05);有效指数F-LASIK组为1.04±0.15,M-LASIK组为1.04±0.14,2组差异无统计学意义(t=0.156,P>0.05).F-LASIK组术后调制传递函数截止频率和斯特列尔比分别为(33.44±6.77) c/d和0.18±0.01,显著高于M-LASIK组[(29.14±9.08)c/d(t=2.264,P<0.05)和0.16±0.01(t=2.439,P<0.05)].F-LASIK组术后眼内散射指数为0.77±0.39,M-LASIK组为1.07±0.63,2组间差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.809,P>0.05).结论 F-LASIK术后可获得较好的客观视觉质量,调制传递函数截止频率和眼内散射的相关因素有待进一步探讨. Objective To investigate the objective optical quality and intraocular scatter after femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome LASIK for myopia correction.Methods This was a retrospective study.Seventy-two myopic eyes of 72 patients who conformed to the criteria for LASIK in preoperative examinations were enrolled.Patients had a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ 1.0.Thirty-five eyes of 35 patients were treated with LASIK with femtosecond laser flap preparation (F-LASIK),male∶female ratio=1∶1.3; 37 eyes of 37 patients were enrolled in the control group with microkeratome flap preparation (M-LASIK),male∶female ratio=l∶2.7.Optical quality parameters were measured in each patient 1 year after the LASIK surgeries:modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTFcutoff,cycles per degree,c/d),Strehl2D ratio (SR) and objective scatter index (OSI).Results Mean age was 26.71±5.89 years in the F-LASIK group and 28.67±6.62 years in the M-LASIK group;mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) was-6.18±2.25 D in the F-LASIK group and-6.62±1.78 D in the M-LASIK group.Neither group had a reduction in BCVA.The safety index was 1.06±0.12 in the F-LASIK group and 1.05±0.14 in the M-LASIK group (t=0.382,P〉0.05),while the efficacy index was 1.04±0.15 in the F-LASIK group and 1.04±0.14 in the M-LASIK group (t=0.156,P〉 0.05).Mean postoperative MTFcutoff was 33.44±6.77 c/d after F-LASIK,which was significantly greater than the mean value of 29.14±9.08 c/d in the M-LASIK (t=2.264,P〈0.05); mean SR was 0.18±0.01 in the F-LASIK,which was significantly greater than the mean value of 0.16±0.01 in the M-LASIK (t=2.439,P〈0.05).Mean OSI was similar between the two groups,with 0.77±0.39 in the F-LASIK group and 1.07±0.63 in the the M-LASIK group (Z=-1.809,P〉0.05).Conclusion Patients acquire better objective optical quality after femtosecond laser LASIK.However,further study is needed to investigate the factors associated with MTFcutoff and intraocular scatter.
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS 2014年第4期211-215,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(11074052) 上海市科委创新计划基础研究重点项目(11JC1402000) 2012年度上海市科技人才优秀学术带头人项目(12XD1401600) 上海市卫生系统优秀学科带头人项目(XBR2013098)
关键词 飞秒激光 角膜磨镶术 激光原位 视觉质量 眼内散射 近视 Femtosecond laser Keratomileusis,laser in situ Optical quality Intraocular Scattering Myopia
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Haft P, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, et al. Complications of LASIK Flaps Made by the lntraLase 15- and 30-kHz Femtosecond Laser[J]. J Refract Surg,2009,25:979-984.
  • 2Hamilton DR, Johnson RD, Lee N, et al. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2008,34:2049-2056.
  • 3Uzbek AK, Kamburoglu G, Mahmoud AM, et al. Change in biomechanical parameters after flap ereation using the Intralase femtoseeond laser and subsequent excimer laser ablation [J]. Curr Eye Res,2011,36:614-619.
  • 4Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecoud laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31 : 120-126.
  • 5Montes-Mico R, Rodriguez-Galietero A, Alio JL. Femtoseeond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia [J]. Ophthalmology, 2007,114 : 62-68.
  • 6Buzzonetti L, Petrocelli G, Valente P, et al. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up[J]. Cornea, 2008,27 : 174- 179.
  • 7买志彬,刘苏冰,聂晓丽,唐秀侠,孙宏霞,辛宝莉.飞秒激光与机械角膜刀制瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后视觉质量对比分析[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2013,15(7):409-413. 被引量:22
  • 8Munoz G, Albarran-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, et al. Long-termcomparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical mierokeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2010,36:1934- 1944.
  • 9Calvo R, Mclaren JW, Hodge DO, et al. Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2010,149:785-793.
  • 10van Bree MC, van Verre HP, Devreese MT, et al. Straylight values after refractive surgery: screening for ocular fitness in demanding professions[J]. Ophthalmology, 2011,118:945-953.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Binder PS. One thousand consecutive IntraLase laser in situkeratomileusis flaps. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006,32 : 962-969.
  • 2Kezirian GM,Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLasefemtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situkeratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2004,30 : 804-811.
  • 3Montes-Mico R, Rodriguez-Galietero A, Ali6 JL. Femtosecondlaser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.Ophthalmology, 2007,114: 62-68.
  • 4Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standardlaser vision correction. J Refract Surg,2001,17:S596-S601.
  • 5Applegate RA,Hilmantel G,Howland HC,et al. Comeal firstsurface optical aberrations and visual performance. J RefractSurg,2000,16:507-514.
  • 6Yamane N, Miyata K, Samejima T,et al. Ocular higher-orderaberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser insitu keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004,45 : 3986 -3990.
  • 7Chalita MR, Krueger RR. Correlation of aberrations with visualacuity and symptoms. Ophthalmol Clin North Am, 2004,17:135-142.
  • 8Mrochen M, Eldine MS, Kaemmerer M, et al. Improvement inphotorefractive comeal laser surgery results using an activeeye-tracking system. J Cataract Refract Surg,2001,27:1000-1006.
  • 9Krueger RR, Seiler T, Gruchman T, et al. Stress waveamplitudes during laser surgery of the cornea. Ophthalmology,2001,108:1070-1074.
  • 10Muller B, Boeck T, Hartmann C. Effect of excimer laser beamdelivery and beam shaping on comeal sphericity inphotorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg,2004,30:464-470.

共引文献21

同被引文献65

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部