期刊文献+

意向性本体论地位问题的折中解答

The Compromise on the Solution to the Ontological Status of Intentionality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 意向性的本体论地位问题,是心灵哲学中的前沿和焦点问题,主要有两种回答,一是意向性怀疑论或取消论,二是意向实在论。随着研究的深入,这两种理论的缺陷逐渐暴露出来,而一种新的、既融合了已有理论的合理因素又有诸多超越的折中理论脱颖而出。它尚在发展之中,但已显示出强大的生命力。折中理论有多种形式,其共同点在于,在"实在""存在"等本体论概念上大做文章,纷纷提出关于存在的新理论,然后据以说明意向性的本体论地位。这些新的理论既提出了解决心灵哲学问题的新方案,又对相关本体论问题作了不无创新的解答。 There are two solutions to the ontological status of intentionality,which is the front edge and focus of philosophy of mind,one is intentionality skepticism or Eliminativism;the other is intentionality realism.Howev-er,with the development of philosophy of mind,the defects of both theories are gradually exposed.A novel eclec-tic theory embracing both the conventionally plausible factors and innovative ideas stands out.Moreover,it shows strong vitality,though still in progress,and demonstrates different forms,which share one thing in common that the new theories of being all base their explanation of the ontological status of intentionality on a different interpreta-tion of the ontological concepts like “substance”and “existence”.All the new theories are worth attention and study,since they not only put forward a new proposal to the solution to the issue of philosophy of mind,but also resolve the ontological issue from a different perspective.
作者 张钰 高新民
出处 《常州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第3期1-6,共6页 Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"东西方心灵哲学极其比较研究"(128LZD120)阶段性成果
关键词 意向性 意义 内容 本体论 intentionality meaning content ontology
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1[2]皮尔士文集(英文版)[M].
  • 2[3]詹姆斯.真理的意义《实用主义》续篇(英文版)[M].1909.
  • 3[6]米德.行动哲学(英文版)[M].1938.
  • 4[9]布里奇曼.一个物理学家的沉思(英文版)[M].1950.
  • 5[10]布里奇曼.现代物理学的逻辑(英文版)[M].1927.
  • 6[14]蒯因.从逻辑的观点看(英文版)[M].1980.
  • 7I. W. Pylyshyn et al (eds.), Meaning and Cognitive Structure, New Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1986, ‘Preface', vii.
  • 8T. Burge, "Wherein is Lauguage Social?"in C. A. Anderson et al (eds.) Propositional Attitudes, Stanford University Press, CSLI, 1990, p. 116.
  • 9J. A. Fodor, "A ModalArgument For Narrow Content", in C,. and G. Macdonald(eds. ), Philosophy of Pschology, Oxford: Blackweell, 1995, p. 206.
  • 10J. A. Fodor, Psychosemantics, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987, p. 97.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部