期刊文献+

肉鸭生物床安全性研究 被引量:3

The Safety of Dcuk Biological Bed
下载PDF
导出
摘要 肉鸭生物床养殖模式是最近几年兴起的一种养殖方式,生物床垫料是否存在病原微生物和重金属超标,一直是人们关注的问题。对使用3个月、6个月、1年、2年、3年的生物床垫料中的病原微生物及重金属含量进行了检测。结果表明,3、6个月的生物床中并无影响禽类的病原微生物;1、2、3年的生物床垫料中的沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌含量较低;大多数样品的重金属含量均低于进口有机肥一级标准,仅3个月生物床垫料中的Cd、2年生物床垫料中的Zn含量高于进口有机肥一级标准但低于二级标准。研究结果表明利用生物床垫料养殖肉鸭是安全可靠的。 Farming ducks on biological bed was a new feeding pattern. Whether the pathogenic microorganisms and heavy metals existed in the material of biological bed were out of normal range was the main problems. The pathogens and heavy metals in the materials of biological bed which used for 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 3 years were detected. The results showed that there were no poultry pathogenic microorganisms in 3 and 6 months materials of biological bed. There were very low levels of Salmonella, E. Coli in 1 year, 2 year and 3 years material. The concentrations of heavy metal in most samples were lower than the primary standard of imported organic fertilizer. Only Cd(cadmium) in three-month material and Zn(zinc) in two-year material were higher than the primary standard of imported organic fertilizer but lower than the secondary criteria. It is indicated that farming ducks on biological bed are safe and reliable.
出处 《湖北农业科学》 北大核心 2014年第5期1120-1122,共3页 Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基金 国家水禽产业技术体系专项(CARS-43-38) 湖北省公益性科技研究项目(2012DBA48001) 武汉市农科院英才项目(YC201202) 武汉市农科院创新项目(CX201310)
关键词 生物床 肉鸭 病原微生物 重金属 biological bed duck pathogenic microorganisms heavy metals
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献51

  • 1孔凡真.日本发酵床养猪技术简介[J].肉品卫生,2005(2):40-40. 被引量:22
  • 2张树清,张夫道,刘秀梅,王玉军,邹绍文,何绪生.规模化养殖畜禽粪主要有害成分测定分析研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):822-829. 被引量:400
  • 3GB/T13885-2003动物饲料中钙、铜、铁、镁、锰、钾、钠和锌含量的测定原子吸收光谱法[S].
  • 4GB/T13079-2006饲料中总砷的测定[S].
  • 5GB8172—1987城镇垃圾农用控制标准[S].
  • 6朱红.基于畜禽废弃物管理的发酵床技术研究[D].南京:南京农业大学硕士学位论文,2007.
  • 7NY525-2002.中华人民共和国行业标准-有机肥料[S].
  • 8GB4284-84.中华人民共和国行业标准-农用污泥中污染物的控制标准[S].
  • 9Add J. Tunnel housing of pigs in Livestock Environment Ⅳ Fourth International Symposium[M].Michigan,American society. Agricultural. Engirmeers, 1993:1040-1048.
  • 10Connor M L. Update on altemative housing systems for pigs[J]. Manitoba Swine Seminar Proceedings,1995,(8):93-96.

共引文献115

同被引文献33

  • 1Jones T A, Dawkina M S. Environment and management fac-tors affecting Pekin duck production and welfare on commer-cial farms in the UK [J]. British Poultry Science, 2010,51(1):12-21.
  • 2Wechsler B,Huber-Eicher B. The effect of foraging materialand perch height on feather pecking and feather damage inlaying hens [J]. Appl Ani Behav Sci,1998,58:131-141.
  • 3Stub C, Ritskes-Hoitinga M,Thon R,et al. Fluctuating asym-metry in mice and rats:Evaluation of the method [J]. Labora-tory Animal,2002,36 : 193-199.
  • 4Cotton S,Praley G S. The effects of environmental enrichmentdevices on feather picking in commercially housed Pekin ducks[J]. Poul Sci,2014,93(9) :2143-2150.
  • 5Driscoll K K M, Broom D M. Environment, well-being, andbehavior:Does access to open water affect the health of Pekinducks (Anas platyrhynchos) . [J]. Poul Sci, 2011,90( 2) : 299 -307.
  • 6Knierim U, Van Dongen S. Forkman B, et al. Fluctuating a-symmetry as an animal welfare indicator: A review of method-,ology and validity [J]. Physiol Behav, 2007, 92 ( 3): 398421.
  • 7Ventura B A,Siewerdt F.Estevez I. Effects of barrier perchesand density on broiler leg health, fear, and performance [J].Poul Sci,2010,89(8);1574-1583.
  • 8Tuyttens F,Heyndrickx M, l)e Boeck M,et al. Broiler chick-en health, welfare and fluctuating asymmet.ry in organic ver-sus conventional production systems [J]. Lives Sci * 2008, 1 13(2/3):123-132.
  • 9Van P E, Van N A, Van D S, et al. Experimental stress doesnot increase fluctuating asymmetry of broiler chickens atslaughter age [J]. Poul Sci,2007,86(1()) :2110-2116.
  • 10由大鹏,杨晓虹.不同饲养方式对樱桃谷肉鸭生长发育的影响[J].内蒙古农业科技,2008,36(2):60-61. 被引量:4

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部