期刊文献+

Er:YAG激光缓解干槽症疼痛症状效果观察 被引量:4

Effect Observation of Er: YAG Laser Therapy in Relieving Dry Socket Pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察Er:YAG激光缓解干槽症疼痛症状的效果。方法将我院收治的58例干槽症随机分成观察组和对照组两组,每组26例。观察组采用Er:YAG激光去除坏死骨组织治疗,对照组使用3%过氧化氢棉球反复擦洗牙槽窝,0.9%氯化钠注射液冲洗后填塞碘仿纱条治疗,比较两组治疗第1、3、7天疼痛评分及治疗第7天疼痛缓解效果。结果观察组治疗第1、3、7天疼痛评分均低于对照组,治疗第7天疼痛缓解总有效率高于对照组,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 Er:YAG激光缓解干槽症疼痛症状效果优于填塞碘仿纱条。 Objective To observe the effect of Err:YAG laser therapy in relieving dry socket pain. Methods A to-tal of 58 patients with dry socket were randomly divided into treatment group(n=26)and control group(n=26). The treat-ment group underwent removal of necrotizing bone tissue by Er:YAG laser therapy,while the control group was repeatly scrubed in tooth socket with 3% hydrogen peroxide tampons,and later tamping iodoform gauzes were washed with 0. 9% sodi-um chloride injection. The pain scores of patients were recorded at 1st,3rd and 7th d of initial treatment,and 7th d odynolysis effects in the two groups were compared. Results In treatment group,the pain scores at 1 st ,3 rd and 7 th d of initial treatment were significantly lower,and 7 th d total effective rates of odynolysis were significantly higher than those in control group( P﹤0. 01). Conclusion The effect of Er:YAG laser therapy is significantly better compared with that by tamping iodoform gauze.
出处 《临床误诊误治》 2014年第5期93-95,共3页 Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy
关键词 干槽症 疼痛 激光疗法 Dry socket Pain Laser therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Cardoso C L, Rodrigues M T, Ferreira Junior O, et al. Clinical concepts of dry socket [ J ]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010,68 ( 8 ) : 1922-1932.
  • 2Blum I R. Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis) : a clinical appraisal of standardization, aetio- pathogenesis and management: a critical review[ J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002,31 ( 3 ) : 309-317.
  • 3李守宏,庞光明.干槽症致病因素及治疗研究进展[J].中华老年口腔医学杂志,2012,10(3):188-192. 被引量:11
  • 4邱蔚六,张震康.口腔颌面外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社.2007:4.
  • 5Lew K K. Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards or- thodontic treatment in an Asian community[ J]. Communi- ty Dent Oral Epidemiol, 1993,21 ( 1 ) :31-35.
  • 6Meng W, Dong Y, Liu J, et al. A clinical evaluation of amlexanox oral adhesive pellicles in the treatment of re-current aphthous stomatitis and comparison with amlexan- ox oral tablets: a randomized, placebo controlled, blin- ded, muhicenter clinical trial[ J]. Trials, 2009,10:30.
  • 7郭家平,王虎中,王林虎.冠周冲洗上药对预防下颌第三磨牙拔除术后并发症的临床研究[J].华南国防医学杂志,2005,19(6):10-11. 被引量:1
  • 8Daly B, Sharif M O, Newton T, et al. Local interven- tions for the management of alveolar osteitis ( dry socket) [ J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012,12:6968.
  • 9Vescovi P, Merigo E, Manfredi M, et al. Surgical treat- ment of maxillary osteonecrosis due to bisphosphonates u- sing an Er:YAG (2940 nm) laser. Discussion of 17 clin- ical cases[ J]. Rev Beige Med Dent (1984) , 2009,64 (2) :87-95.
  • 10Yoshino T, Aoki A, Oda S, et al. Long-term histologic analysis of bone tissue alteration and healing following Er: YAG laser irradiation compared to electrosurgery[ J ]. J Periodontol, 2009,80( 1 ) :82-92.

二级参考文献34

  • 1孟庆蓉,张三友,雷莉,肖晓蓉,朱砾.拔牙创干槽症致病因素的探讨[J].临床口腔医学杂志,1994,10(4):218-220. 被引量:24
  • 2[1]邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学.北京:人民卫生出版社,1993,106
  • 3[2]Garcia A,Gude F,Gandara J,et al.Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower thirdmolar.J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1997,55 (11):1223 ~ 1226
  • 4[3]Esen E,Taser F,Akban O.Determination of the anti-inflammatory effect of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery.J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1999,57(10):1201 ~ 1206
  • 5[5]Bonine FL.Effect of chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of dryness in impacted mandibular third molar extraction sites.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol,1995,79(2):154 ~ 158
  • 6[6]Ragno JR.Szkutnik AJ.Evaluation of 0.12%chlorhexidine rinse on the preverion of alveolar osteitis.Oral Surf Oral Med Oral Pathol,1991,72(2):524 ~ 526
  • 7[7]Larsen PE.The effect of a chlorhexidine rinse on the in-cidence of alveolar osteitis following the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.Oral Maxillofac Surg,1991,49:932 ~ 937
  • 8[8]Fotos PG,Koorbusch GF,Sarasin DS,et al.Evaluation of intra-alveolar chlorhexidine dressing after removal of impacted mandibular third molar.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol,1992,383 ~ 388
  • 9Iaidh, Ashraf Abukaraky, Faleb sawair, etal. Frequency est- imates and risk factor for postoperative morbidity after third molar removal:a prospective cohort study [J].Oral maxill- ofacial surg, 2008,66(4): 2276-2283.
  • 10Ahmad-Reza, Norooz, Rawlef.Modern concepts in under- standing and management of the dry socket syndrome: comp- rehensive review of the literature[J]. Oral surg, oral med, oral path, oral radio, 2009, 107(1 ): 30-35.

共引文献27

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部