期刊文献+

深水固井作业井喷事故的蝴蝶结模型 被引量:3

Bowknot Model for Blowout Accident in Deepwater Cementing Operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于浅层水和浅层气等高压流体预测的困难性和危害性,深水固井作业过程中面临很多的难题。以往人们总是关注钻进过程中的井喷事件的防控,但2010年英国石油公司(bp)"深水地平线"钻探平台发生爆炸事故改变了人们的看法,固井作业质量差同样会导致井喷。对井喷处理措施的不当,不仅会造成井毁人亡的恶性事故,同时大量溢油入海更会严重破环海洋环境,造成严重的生态灾难。以bp事故报告为依据,将事故树分析与事件树分析相结合,对深水固井作业溢流的原因、井涌监测失败的原因和井喷的后果进行了详细分析,分别建立了深水固井作业溢流和溢流井涌监测失效的故障树。并结合井喷事件树建立了固井作业井喷事故的蝴蝶结模型。该模型为深水固井作业过程井喷事故的防控提供了一定的依据和参考。 Due to the harmfulness high pressure fluid such as shallow groundwater, shallow gas, etc. and the difficulties faced in pre- dicting them, a lot of problems will occur in deepwater cementing process. People are always concerned about the prevention and control of blowout events in the drilling process, but the explosion of British Petroleum Company's drilling platfolln named Deepwater Horizon in 2010 changed people's view, the poor quality of cementing operation also causes blowout. Improper treatment measures for blowout not only cause malignant accident, but also a lot of oil spilling into the sea would seriously disrupt the marine environment to cause serious ecological disaster. Based on British Petroleum Company's accident report, the causes of the overflow in deepwater ce- menting operation, the reasons for welD-kick monitoring failure and the consequences of blowout are analyzed by combining the fault tree analysis with event tree analysis, and the fault trees for the overflow in cementing operations and for well-kick monitoring failure are established. Finally, Bowknot model for blowout accident in deepwater cementing operation is established based on blowout event tree, and it can provide the basis and reference for the prevention and control of blowout events in the cementing operation.
出处 《石油工业技术监督》 2014年第5期1-5,共5页 Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"完井井控安全评估体系研究"(编号:10CX04035A)
关键词 深水钻井 固井作业 井喷 故障树 蝴蝶结模型 风险分析 deepwater drilling cementing operation blowout fault tree bowknot model risk analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1赵建平,张秀敏.石化装置定量风险分析软件系统的开发[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,28(2):27-30. 被引量:3
  • 2W. Kent Muhlbauer. Pipeline Risk Management Manual(2^nd Edition)[M]. Burlington, USA: Gulf Professional Publish- ing, 1996 : 335 - 363.
  • 3DNV-RP-F107, Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection[S]. 2001.
  • 4DNV-RP-F206, Riser Integrity Assessment[ S]. 2008.
  • 5Yong Bai ,Qiang Bai. Subsea Pipelines and Risers[M]. Oxford, UK,2005:685 -749.
  • 6Ching-Torng Lin,Mao-Jiun J Wang. Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets[J]. Reliability Engineering and Safety Sys- tem, 1997,58(3) :205 -213.
  • 7Clemen R T, Winkler R L. Combing probability distribution from experts in risk analysis [J]. Risk Analysis, 1999, 19(2) : 187 - 293.
  • 8Shu-Jen Chen,Cing-Lai Hwang, Frank P Hwang. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications[M]. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992:138 - 150.
  • 9Onisawa T. An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility[J]. Fuzzy Sets and System, 1988,27(2) :87 - 103.
  • 10Phil Rae,Gino Di Lullo.Lightweight Cement Formulations for Deep Water Cementing:Fact and Fiction[J].SPE,91002.

共引文献83

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部