期刊文献+

动态视角下我国3E全要素生产率的区域差异研究 被引量:3

China's Regional Disparity of 3E Total Factor Productivity in a Dynamic View
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于含有动态效应的全局Malmquist-Luenberger指数和方向性SBM方法,本文以中国30个省份1998~2011年的数据为样本,研究了资本动态效应下3E全要素生产率增长趋势,以及增长模式的省份差异,并引入Bootstrap-DEA方法计算了全要素生产率变化估计值及其置信区间,通过Bootstrap纠偏提高了测度的准确性。我们发现:(1)1998~2011年我国3E全要素生产率呈增长趋势,但增长率却一直维持在1%以下,其原因是3E前沿面追赶效应和移动效应呈现出的互补状态;(2)传统技术进步是当期投入产出质量水平的提升程度,而资本动态效应是资本跨期作用引起的前沿面移动效应,表示资本的滞后效应导致的技术进步,导致资本动态效应滞后于传统技术进步增长率。 This paper applies global Malmquist-Luenberger Index and SBM directional function with dynamic factor to measure Energy-Economy-Environment( 3E) total factor productivity and its components in China's 30 provincial regions over the period 1998 to 2011. Bootstrap methodology is introduced to estimate confidence intervals for technical efficiency,which provides a correction for the inherent bias in Malmquist-Luenberger DEA estimation. The major conclusions are as follows: 3E total factor productivity increases with a low rate which dues to the complementary state of 3E frontier catch-up and shift effects; the traditional technique progress lags dynamic effect of capital.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期1-14,共14页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家发改委"低碳发展对我国经济增长影响研究"项目资助(201203)
关键词 能源环境效率 全要素生产率 资本动态效应 全局Malmquist-Luenberger指数 BOOTSTRAP方法 energy and environment efficiency total factor productivity dynamic effect of capital global malmquist-luenberger index bootstrap
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

共引文献8058

同被引文献52

  • 1赵克勤.集对分析及其初步应用[J].大自然探索,1994,13(1):67-72. 被引量:294
  • 2FARE R,GROSSKOPF S,NORRIS M,et al.Productivity growth,technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries[J].The American Economic Review,1994,84(1):66-83.
  • 3HAILU A,VEEMAN T.S.Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs:an application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2001,83(3):605-616.
  • 4SEIFORD L M,ZHU J.Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation[J].European Journal of Operation Research,2002,142(1):16-20.
  • 5SCHEEL H.Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,132(2):400-410.
  • 6CHUNG Y.H.,FARE R,GROSSKOPF S.Productivity and undesirable outputs:a directional distance function approach[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1997,51(3):229-240.
  • 7MANAGI S,KUMAR S.Trade-induced technological change:analyzing economic and environmental outcomes[J].Economic Modelling,2009,26(3):721-732.
  • 8KUMBHAKAR C,LOVELL K.Stochastic Frontier Analysis[M].Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,2000.
  • 9FARE R,GROSSKOPF S,PASURKA J C A.Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth[J].Journal of Regional Science,2001,41(3):381-409.
  • 10Kumar S.Environmental sensitive productivity growth:global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index[J].Ecological Economics,2006,56(2):280-293.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部