期刊文献+

考虑银行破产外部效应的存款保险定价模型 被引量:4

Deposit Insurance Pricing Method Considering Bankruptcy Externalities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用存款保险的期望损失定价方法和Shapley值法,建立了考虑银行违约/破产外部效应的存款保险定价模型。模型中度量的破产成本不仅考虑了银行破产清算过程中其自身资产价值的损失,还考虑了银行违约/破产的负外部效应——可能增加其他银行的破产损失,据此确定的存款保险保费反映了各银行对系统总破产成本的边际贡献。为验证模型效果,构造了三种情景进行模拟分析,结果表明:存款保险保费与银行系统对破产银行资产的收购能力负相关,且负相关程度随经济形势的恶化而加剧;保费与整个银行系统参保银行数目之间也呈负相关关系。 It is generally considered that the overall costs of bank failures are higher than those in other industries. This is due to the existence of negative externalities of bank failures,which may lead to additional loss of the default banks' assets. This paper establishes a pricing model of deposit insurance with consideration of bankruptcy externalities. It is taken into account that each default bank's bankruptcy cost involves not only its assets loss caused by liquidation but also the externalities that may increase other banks' bankruptcy cost. Expected loss pricing method is used to calculate the net premium of deposit insurance while the additional premium is determined utilizing Shapley value. The total premium accordingly reflects each bank's marginal contribution to the total bankruptcy cost of the whole banking system. Three scenarios are constructed to test the model. The results show that it is negatively correlated between the premium and the banking system's acquisition ability of the bankruptcy assets,and this correlation becomes more significant when the economic situation deteriorates. Meanwhile,the number of insured banks in the banking system impacts the premium negatively.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期206-212,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171032) 中央高校基本科研业务费科研专题项目(DUT11RW202) 留学回国人员科研启动基金(第43批)
关键词 金融 定价模型 SHAPLEY值 存款保险 finance pricing model Shapley value deposit insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1James C.The losses realized in bank failures[J].Journal of Finance,1991,46(4);1223-1242.
  • 2BuserS A,Chen A H,Kane E J.Federal deposit insurance,regulatory policy,and optimal bank capital[J].Journal of Finance,1981,36(1):51-60.
  • 3Hwang D Y,Shie F S,Wang K,Lin J C.The pricing of deposit insurance considering bankruptcy costs and closure policies [J].Journal of Banking & Finance,2009,33(10):1909-1919.
  • 4Gendreau B C,Prince S S.The private cost of bank failures:some historical evidence[J].Business Review,1986,(3):3-14.
  • 5Acharya V V,Santos J A C,Yorulmazer T.Systemic risk and deposit insurance premiums [J].Economic Policy Review,2010,(8):89-99.
  • 6Staum J C.Systemic risk components and deposit insurance premia[J].Quantitative Finance,2012,12(4);651-662.
  • 7刘海龙,杨继光.基于银行监管资本的存款保险定价研究[J].管理科学学报,2011,14(3):73-82. 被引量:37
  • 8Shubik M.Incentives,decentralized control,the assignment of joint costs and internal pricing[J].Management Sciences,1962,8(3):325-343.
  • 9郑鑫,朱晓曦,马卫民.基于Shapley值法的三级闭环供应链收益分配模型[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(4):17-22. 被引量:33
  • 10孙晓琳,秦学志,陈田.监管宽容下资本展期的存款保险定价模型[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(1):150-156. 被引量:15

二级参考文献52

共引文献75

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部