期刊文献+

脓毒症患者血清脑钠肽水平与APACHEⅡ评分的研究 被引量:4

The relationship between brain natriuretic peptide and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)in patients with sepsis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨脓毒症患者血清脑钠肽(BNP)水平与急性生理学与慢性健康情况评价系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分的变化。方法选取北京市石景山医院103例脓毒症患者测定入院后24 h内的血清BNP、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞(WBC)等,按照APACHEⅡ评分分为三组:低危组(n=32)、中危组(n=41)和高危组(n=30),比较三组间血清BNP水平的变化。按照28d结局分为两组:存活组(n=75)和死亡组(n=28),比较两组间血清BNP的变化。结果中危组脓毒症患者血清BNP水平显著高于低危组脓毒症患者[(903±105)ng/L vs(521±97)ng/L,P<0.01],高危组脓毒症患者血清BNP显著高于中危组脓毒症患者[(1 501±197)ng/L vs(903±105)ng/L,P<0.01]。死亡组脓毒症患者血清BNP较存活组明显升高[(1 239±208)ng/L vs(465±120)ng/L,P<0.01)]。结论血清BNP水平与APACHEⅡ评分密切相关,血清BNP水平是预测脓毒症预后的较为敏感的指标。 Objective To explore the relationship between brain natriuretic peptide( BNP) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ) in sepsis patients. Methods Totally 103 patients were divided into three groups:low score group( n = 32),media score group(n = 41)and high score group(n = 30)according to APACHEⅡ scores. Based on the 28- day outcomes of patients,the patients were divided into survival group(n = 75)and death group(n = 28). The difference of BNP,C-reactive protein(CRP) and white blood cell(WBC)between the above groups was compared. Results The serum levels of BNP were significantly higher in patients with media score than that in patients with low score [(903 ± 105)ng / L vs(521 ± 97)ng / L,P 〈 0. 01],and the serum levels of BNP were significantly higher in patients with high score than that in patients with median score [(1 501 ± 197) ng / L vs(903 ± 105)ng / L,P 〈 0. 01]. The serum levels of BNP were significantly higher in death group than that in survival group [(1 239 ± 208) ng / L vs(465 ± 120)ng / L,P 〈 0. 01]. Conclusion The serum level of BNP is associated with BNP,which can be used for predicting the outcomes of septic patients.
出处 《山西医科大学学报》 CAS 2014年第5期401-403,共3页 Journal of Shanxi Medical University
关键词 脓毒症 脑钠肽 APACHE II评分 sepsis brain natriuretic peptide APACHE Ⅱ
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Vincent JL, Opal SM, Marshall JC,et al. Sepsis definitions; timefor change[ J]. Lancet,2013 ,381 (9868) :774 -775.
  • 2Singh S,Evans TW. Organ dysfunction during sepsis[ J]. Inten-sive Care Med,2006,32(3) :349 -360.
  • 3Kibe S, Adams K, Barlow G. Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkersof sepsis in critical care[ J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,2011,66 :33 -40.
  • 4徐萌敏,孙小军,杨越明.老年脓毒症患者血清胆碱酯酶与APACHEⅡ评分及预后的关系[J].中华临床感染病杂志,2010,3(6):346-347. 被引量:3
  • 5Chang KC, Unsinger J, Davis CG,et al. Multiple triggers of celldeath in sepsis : death receptor and mitochondrial-mediated apop-tosis[J].FASEB J,2007,21(3) :708 -719.
  • 6Bagshaw SM,Bellomo R’Jacka MJ,et al. The impact of early hy-poglycemia and blood glucose variability on outcome in critical ill-ness[ J] . Crit Care,2009,13(3) :91.
  • 7Roberts JA,Ulldemolins M,Roberts MS,et al. Therapeutic drugmonitoring of beta-lactams in critica-lly ill patients : proof of con-cept [ J] .Int J Antimicrob Agents,2010,36(4) :332 -339.
  • 8Meisner Ml, Tschaikowsky K, Palmaers T, et al. Comparison ofprocalcitonin ( PCT) and C-reactive protein ( CHP) plasma con-centrations at different SOFA scores during the course of sepsisand MODS [J]. Crit Care,1999,3( 1) :45 -50.
  • 9Sudoh T,Kangawa K,Minamino N,et al. A new natriuretic pep-tide in porcine brain[ J] . Nature, 1988 ,332(6159) :78 -81.
  • 10Mokart D, Sannini A, Brun JP, e( al. NT - proBNP as an earlyprognostic factor in cancer patients developing se ptic shock [ J ].Crit Care,2007,11(1) :37 -40.

二级参考文献11

  • 1朱建一,闻平.血清胆碱酯酶和前白蛋白对肝脏合成功能监测的意义[J].临床检验杂志,2004,22(6):458-458. 被引量:24
  • 2周国鹏,宋以信,赵志杰.APACHE评价系统对75岁以上老年重症病人预后评价价值[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(4):251-253. 被引量:20
  • 3Erbay H,Yalcin AN,Serin S,et al.Nosocomial infections in intensive care unit in a Turkish university hospital:a 2-year survey.Intensive Care Med,2003,29(9):1482-1488.
  • 4Sheu CC, Gong MN, Zhai R, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of sepsis - related vs non - sepsis - related ards [ J ]. Chest ,2010,138 (3) :559 - 567.
  • 5Delibegovic S, Markovic D, Hodzic S. Apache ii scoring system is superior in the prediction of the outcome in critically ill patients with perforative peritonitis [ J ] Medicinski arhiv,2011, 65(2) :82 -85.
  • 6Sakamoto Y, Mashiko K, Matsumoto H, et al. Selection of acute blood purification therapy according to severity score and bloodlactic acid value in patients with septic shock[ J]. Indian J Crit Care med, 2010,14(4) : 175 -179.
  • 7Puskarich MA, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, et al. Prognostic value and agreement of achieving lactate clearance or central venous oxygen saturation goals during early sepsis resuscitation [ J. Acad Emerg Meal, 2012,19(3) :252 -258.
  • 8Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, et al. Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: A randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA, 2010,303 (8) :739 -746.
  • 9Ware LB, Koyama T, Billheimer DD, et al. Prognostic and pathogenetic value of combining clinical and biochemical indices in patients with acute lung injury[ J ]. Chest,2010,137 (2) :288 -296.
  • 10赵祥文.脓毒症的诊断与治疗[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2008,23(18):1397-1399. 被引量:8

共引文献6

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部