期刊文献+

宫颈癌淋巴结转移相关因素的分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the Relative Factors of Lymph-nodes Metastasis in Patients with Cervical Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过分析宫颈癌淋巴结转移与各临床病理因素的关系,探讨影响宫颈癌淋巴结转移的高危因素。方法收集2005年1月-2010年12月间行手术治疗的136例临床ⅠA-ⅡA期宫颈癌患者的临床病理资料,将淋巴结转移与各临床病理因素之间的关系进行单因素χ2检验及多因素logistic回归分析。结果总的淋巴结转移率为14.0%(19/136),其中以闭孔淋巴结转移为主(占63.2%),其次为髂内外淋巴结(占42.1%),而腹股沟深淋巴结、腹主动脉旁淋巴结均无转移。单因素分析显示临床分期、间质浸润深度、肿瘤病理类型、宫旁浸润、阴道浸润与淋巴结转移间具有相关性(P<0.05);而多因素分析显示仅临床分期、肿瘤病理类型、间质浸润深度与淋巴结转移相关。结论临床分期、肿瘤病理类型、间质浸润深度为淋巴结转移的高危因素。 Objective To analyze the relative factors of lymph-nodes metastasis (LM) in patients with cervical cancer. Methods The clinico-pathological data of 136 patients with stage I A- 1I A of cervical cancer who underwent surgical therapy from January 2005 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between clinico- pathological parameters and LM was analyzed by univariable Z2 analysis and multivariable logistic analysis. Results The total LM rate (LMR) was 14.0% (19/136). The rate of LM in obturator was the highest (63.2%), and then the rate between the external and internal iliac was 42.1%. The rate of deep inguinal lymph nodes and para-aortic lymph node was 0.0%. There was correlation between the clinic staging, depth of stromal invasion, histologic subtype, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion and LM in univariable analysis (P 〈 0.05). While in multivariable analysis, the correlation with LM was only existed between the clinic staging, histologic subtype, depth of stromal invasion and LM. Conclusion Clinic staging, histologic subtype, depth of stromal invasion are high risk factors of LM.
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2014年第5期921-924,共4页 West China Medical Journal
关键词 宫颈癌 淋巴结转移 临床分期 肿瘤病理类型 间质浸润深度 Cervical cancer Lymph-nodes metastasis Clinic staging Histologic subtype Depth of stromal invasion
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1卞美璐.WHO(2006年)宫颈癌综合防治实践指南简介[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2007,23(7):557-560. 被引量:106
  • 2杨玲,李连弟,陈育德,D.M.Parkin.中国2000年及2005年恶性肿瘤发病死亡的估计与预测[J].中国卫生统计,2005,22(4):218-221. 被引量:336
  • 3曹泽毅.中华妇产科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.584.
  • 4Benedet JL,Odicino F,Maisonneuve P,et al.Carcinoma of the cervix uteri[J].J Epidemiol Biostat,2001,6(1): 7-43.
  • 5万晓丽,郄明蓉,张健,柴青,王红静,刘辉.宫颈鳞癌临床分期和淋巴结转移高危因素分析[J].现代妇产科进展,2009,18(1):31-34. 被引量:3
  • 6Torabi M,Aquino SL,Harisinghani MG.Current concepts in lymph node imaging[J].J Nucl Med,2004,45(9): 1509-1518.
  • 7Chung HH,Kang SB,Cho JY,et al.Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer?[J].Jpn J Clin Oncol,2007,37(5): 370-375.
  • 8Sheu MH,Chang CY,Wang JH,et al.Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with Mr imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls[J].Eur Radiol,2001,11(9): 1828-1833.
  • 9Bellomi M,Bonomo G,Landoni F,et al.Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma[J].Eur Radiol,2005,15(12): 2469-2474.
  • 10Park W,Park YJ,Huh SJ,et al.The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer[J].Jpn J Clin Oncol,2005,35(5): 260-264.

二级参考文献54

  • 1冯淑瑜,张彦娜,刘建刚.宫颈癌淋巴结转移的高危因素及预后分析[J].癌症,2005,24(10):1261-1266. 被引量:71
  • 2李相生,周纯武.综合评价CT、MRI及PET在子宫颈癌术前分期及术后随访中的作用[J].癌症进展,2006,4(2):119-123. 被引量:27
  • 3李连弟,鲁凤珠.1990—1992年中国恶性肿瘤死亡流行分布情况分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1996,18(6):403-407. 被引量:226
  • 4Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 6th Annual Report on the Resuhs of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet ,2006,95 : S43-S103.
  • 5Oellinger JJ, Blohmer JU, Michniewicz K, et al. Pre-operatire staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography ( CT ) with histologic results [ J ]. Zentralbl Gynakol, 2000,122:82-91.
  • 6Baltzer J ,Kopcke W,Lohe KJ ,et al. Surgical treatment of cervix cancer. Treatment results and data on the postoperative course over a minimum of 5 years following uniform surgery and standardized histological examination of the histological material of 1092 patients at 4 university gyne-cology clinics [ J ]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 1984,44 : 279-285.
  • 7Chung HH, Kang SB, Cho JY, et al. Can preoperative MRI accurately evaluate nodal and parametrial invasion in early stage cervical cancer? [ J ] Jpn J Clin Oncol, 2007,37 : 370-375.
  • 8Sheu MH, Chang CY, Wang JH, et al. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls [ J ]. Eur Radiol, 2001, 11 : 1828-1833.
  • 9Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma[ J]. AIR Am J Roentgenol,2000 ,175 :759-766.
  • 10Chandacham A, Charoenkwan K, Siriaunkgul S, et al. Extent of lymphovaseular space invasion and risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in stage IB1 cervical cancer[ J]. J Med Assoc Thai,2005,88 :S31-S36.

共引文献503

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部