期刊文献+

脑卒中肢体功能恢复的家庭康复指导 被引量:1

Family rehabilitation guidance for improvement of limb function of patients with cerebral stroke
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :通过家庭康复指导恢复脑卒中患者肢体功能,改善脑卒中患者的生活质量。方法 :将患者分为脑卒中康复组30例和脑卒中对照组30例。康复组采用上门指导康复,疗程6个月。采用Fugl-Meyer评估法、运动年龄评估法和Brunnstrom脑卒中运动功能评估法对两组患者进行评估和比较。结果 :康复组30例患者经6个月康复指导,肢体功能均有不同程度提高。结论 :家庭康复指导有助于脑卒中患者肢体功能的恢复。 Objective:To enhance the limb function of the patients with cerebral stroke and to improve their life quality under the guidance of family rehabilitation. Methods:The patients were divided into the rehabilitation group and the control group with 30 cases each. The rehabilitation group was arranged door to door rehabilitation guidance for 6 months. The patients in two groups were assessed and compared with the assessment methods of Fugl-Meyer, the age of exercise and Brunnstrom. Results:The limb function of 30 patients with cerebral stroke in the rehabilitation group was improved in varying degrees after 6 months’ rehabilitation. Conclusion: Family rehabilitation guidance contributes to the improvement of limb function of the patients with cerebral stroke.
作者 周宪珍 王芸
出处 《上海医药》 CAS 2014年第10期60-62,共3页 Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 脑卒中 社区 康复 护理 cerebral stroke community rehabilitation nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Spitzer WO. State of science 1986; Quality of life and functional status as target variables for research[J]. J Chron Dis, 1987, 40(6): 465~469
  • 2Berwick DM, Budman S,Damico-W hite J, et al. Assessment if psycho logical morbidityin promary care: explorations with the general health questionnaire[J]. J Chron Dis, 1987,40:71~79
  • 3Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Cartcr WB, et al. The Sickness Impact and final revision of a health status measure [ J ]. Med Carc, 1981,19:787~805
  • 4Hunt Sm, Mc Jebba SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation stady[J]. J Epidemiol Commun Health, 1980, 34:281~289
  • 5Essink Bot ML, Krabbc PF, Bonscl GJ, et al. An emphirical comparison of four gencric health status measures. The nottingham health profile, the medical outcomes study 36-item short-form health survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, aqol instrument[J]. Med Care, 1997, 35(5): 522~537
  • 6Torrance GW, Feeny D. Uilities and quality-adjusted life years[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care,1989, 5(4): 559~575
  • 7Gafni A. The standard gamblc method: What is being measured and how it is interpreted[J]. Health Scrv Rcs, 1994, 29(2): 207~224
  • 8Dongping Yin, Howard PF, Curtis PL. Evaluating health services: the importance of patients' preferemce and quality of life[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995, 165(6): 1 323~1 328
  • 9Dolan P, Gudex C. Time preference, duration and health staduations[J]. Health Econ, 1995, 4(4): 289~299
  • 10Karen B, Magnus J. Relationship between quality of life nintents, health state utilities, and willingness to pay in patients with asthma[J]. Ann aller Asthm Immun, 1998, 80:189~194

共引文献10

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部