期刊文献+

企业研发边界决定:基于问题解决与知识互动的理论解释

The Decision of Firm's R&D Boundary:Theoretical Explanation based on Problem-solving and Knowledge-interacting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借鉴基于知识的企业观点,从知识互动和问题解决视角探讨了企业研发边界决定,认为企业研发边界是由搜寻解决方案的期望费用和知识方案的互动程度共同决定的,且其取决于不同治理形式下不同类型问题的解决成本和效率。通常,市场在治理低交互作用问题时是有效的,基于权威的层级组织在治理中等交互作用问题时是有效的,组织间形式则在治理高交互作用问题时是有效的。 Using knowledge-based view of the firm ,this paper examines the decision of firm's R&D boundary from knowl-edge-interacting and problem-solving Perspective .Unlike the theories of transaction costs and the indeterminacy ,in this pa-per we argue that firm's R&D boundary depends on the expected cost of solution search and the interaction of knowledge , it decided by the solution costs and efficiency of different problems under different governance modes .Usually ,markets are quite efficient in solving problems of low interaction ,authority-based hierarchy is efficient for Moderate interaction prob-lems ,and Interorganizational form is efficient in solving high interaction problems .Interorganizational coordination way more suitable for heuristic search that promoting complex problem solving ,heuristic search need much more knowledge in-teraction ,and the way of cooperative R&D among organizations can greatly reduce the risk of knowledge transfer ,and pro-mote a greater range of knowledge sharing and interaction .Thus ,this can explain that with the increasing complexity of technological development ,cross-boundary cooperative R&D alliance widely appears among enterprises .
作者 董华 刘太强
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期66-71,共6页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 山东省社科规划项目(13CGLJ10)
关键词 研发边界 问题解决 合作研发 知识互动 R&D Boundary Cooperative R&D Problem Solving Knowledge Interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1WERNERFELT B. A resource based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management, 1984(12) : 75 -94.
  • 2TEECE D, G PISANO A SHUEN. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management, 1997, 18(7) :509- 533.
  • 3NELSON R R, S G WINTER. An evolutionary theory of e-conomic change[M]. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1982.
  • 4CONNER K R, C K PRAHALAD. A resource-based theo ry of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism[J]. Organ. Sci,1996, 7(5) :477 -501.
  • 5GRANT R M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management,1996(17) : 109- 122.
  • 6HENDERSON R M, K B CLARK. Architectural innova tion: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms[J]. Admin. Sci. Quart, 1990(35) : 9-30.
  • 7GAVETTI G D E LEVINTHAI.. Looking forward and loo- king backward: cognitive and experiential search [J]. Ad- min. Sci. Quart, 2000(45):113 -137.
  • 8WALSH J P. Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane[J]. Organ. Sci, 1995, 6(3) : 280-321.
  • 9ADLER P S, S-W KWON. Social capital: prospects for a newconcept[J].Acad. ManagementRev, 2002, 27(1) :17- 40.
  • 10左言庆,董华.企业研发边界影响因素的国外研究综述[J].技术经济,2010,29(1):24-28. 被引量:2

二级参考文献18

  • 1COASE R H. The nature of the firm[J]. Economica, 1937,4(16) : 386-405.
  • 2TEECE D J. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy[J]. Research Policy, 1986,15(6) : 285-305.
  • 3GRILICHES Z. The search for R&D spillovers[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1992, 94 (Supplement) : 29-47.
  • 4COHEN W M, NELSON R R, WALSH J P. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U. S. manufacturing firms patent (or not) [R]. NBER,2000, No. 7552.
  • 5BARNEY J B. How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions[J]. Sloan Management Review, 1999, Spring: 137-145.
  • 6ARGYERS N, ZENGER T. Are capability-based theories of firm boundaries really distinct from transaction cost theory? [C]//Academy of Management Proceedings. New York: Academy of Management, 2007 : 1-6.
  • 7NAKAMURA K,ODAGIRI H. R&D boundaries of the firm: an estimation of the double-hurdle model on commissioned R&D,joint R&D, and licensing in Japan[J]. Econ. Innov. New Techn. ,2005,14(7) :583-615.
  • 8GRANSTRAND O, PATEL P, PAVITT K. Multi-technology corporations: why they have 'distributed' rather than'distinctive core' competencies[J]. California Management Review, 1997,39(4) :8-25.
  • 9VEUGELERS R,CASSIMAN B. Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms[J]. Research Policy, 1999,28 (1) : 63-80.
  • 10LAFONTAINE F, SLADE M. Vertical integration and firm boundaries: the evidence [ J ]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2007,45 (3) : 629-685.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部